Explore / Jewellery / Natalie Perry
Jewellery

Natalie Perry

Verdict RATED

Natalie Perry states a fibre composition on 96.3% of the 81 products read from its catalogue. A Throne fibre score is only published at full disclosure, so this report carries Natalie Perry's Good On You rating and the transparency finding rather than a headline score.

Listed, not scored
Every SKU is accounted for, but the evidence is not yet classifiable by this score engine.
Shop  
Link to the brand’s own site.
No brand pays for a place or a score. Membership funds the scans; affiliate links cover the rest.

About Natalie Perry

24 of 184 fields held
Everything the scan holds on this record, grouped by subject. Blue bars show how much information is held; they are not positive or negative scores. Fields with nothing behind them are counted, not listed.
7 groups · 24 fields
Scan result 14 of 59
Scan note (above product table) 82 SKUs scanned, 79 filtered, 3 in the score result. Every SKU is accounted for, but the evidence is not yet classifiable by this score engine.
Total styles scanned 82
Last scanned 2026-09-13
Why no score Every SKU is accounted for, but the evidence is not yet classifiable by this score engine.
Full catalogue scan? yes
Reason / scan status Yes. Every discovered SKU is accounted for; filtered SKUs remain visible and every included SKU has composition evidence and its own source URL.
Publication status withheld
Method version Throne Standard full-catalogue 2026.09
In-scope catalogue total 82
Products read 82
Last checked 2026-09-02
Products in catalogue 82
Catalogue read % 100
Clean verdict RATED
Certification 1 of 4
Key facts certifications fairtrade-c
Sourcing and supply chain 2 of 24
Claim sources 2
Checked source the brand's own published disclosure
Identity 2 of 24
Brand name Natalie Perry
Made in Natalie Perry is based in United Kingdom.
Claims and evidence 1 of 10
Verification status data-only
Price and commerce 1 of 10
Price tier 4
Further detail 3 of 53
Directory rating Good
Garment category jewellery
Goy rating Good

Boycott lists

5 lists
Every list we check, and what each one says about this brand and its parent. A brand absent from a list is shown as not listed, which is a result, not a gap.
ListResultWhat the list says
BDS Movement bdsmovement.net · priority targets Not listed Checked 2026-09-12 Not named among the current priority boycott, organic-boycott or pressure targets. Consumer boycott targets named by the Palestinian BDS National Committee. Open the source
Ethical Consumer ethicalconsumer.org · current boycotts Not checked Ongoing consumer boycott calls, with the reason and who called it.
No Thanks No Thanks app Not checked Crowd-maintained list of companies to avoid, checked by barcode.
Boycat Boycat app Not checked Campaign-led list covering brands and their parent companies.
Who Profits whoprofits.org Not checked Companies named in the research database on the occupied territories.
A listing is a fact about the list, not our verdict. It sits beside the scan; it does not move the score.

Scored elsewhere

The exact figure each directory publishes for this record, on its own scale. They rate brand policy; we read the product.
DirectoryTheir scoreWhat it measures
Good On You Good 1-5: We Avoid / Not Good Enough / It's a Start / Good / Great Rates brand policy and published commitments, not the product. We checked 2026-08-24.
Good On You Good out of 5 Rates brand policy and published commitments, not the product.
Good On You Good out of 5 Rates brand policy and published commitments, not the product.
Free pass · three reports a month
You have the verdict. The working is behind the pass.

The summary and the instant check are free on every record, always. Members also get the results table item by item, the certificates as checked on each register, and what the brand would not disclose.

Start with a free pass £1 a day · £365 a year
What the full scan adds
The results table, item by item
Named mills, factories and suppliers
Every certificate as checked on the register
The source behind each figure, and its date
What the brand would not disclose
Something need changing?
Tell us.

Point at the field and the source. We check it against the register and republish.

Report a correction