BDS Movement
Checked 2026-10-03
The brand and its documented aliases are not named in this source snapshot. Parent-company links require separate evidence.
Read list evidenceThrone Standard 2.2 · Textiles
1.0/5 0% of products with a composition are entirely plant
You are reading your 1 free report. A free account opens 3 full reports a month. Reports you already opened stay open.
Recorded findings grouped by subject. Blue bars show field completeness, not a score. Saved statements must be read with their source dates and evidence limits.
Shown only where this record mentions the scheme or a dated register check exists. Product and supplier certificates are separate.
| GOTS | Mentioned in the stored report. No verified brand certificate or membership record is attached. |
|---|---|
| OEKO-TEX Standard 100 | Mentioned in the stored report. No verified brand certificate or membership record is attached. |
| Fibre Breakdown | Hemp + certified organic cotton + 4% Lycra. Exact hemp/cotton split and SKU consistency will be verified by the scanner. |
|---|---|
| Materials used | hemp, organic cotton Read recorded source |
| GOTS | Certified organic cotton is stated; a brand-held GOTS certification was not verified. |
|---|---|
| OEKO-TEX® Standard 100 | A brand-held OEKO-TEX certification was not verified. |
| Other Certifications | The brand states its fabric supplier/factory is associated with Fair Wear Foundation; the exact current scope should be checked separately. Recorded on this listing. Not a reviewed certificate or register result. |
| Vegan | Brand declares vegan: Not confirmed. Animal-derived fabrics found: Not confirmed. |
| Cotton: type / certification | Certified organic cotton Recorded on this listing. Not a reviewed certificate or register result. |
| Supply-chain summary | Fabric origin country and dye-process claims are disclosed more clearly than many small brands; fibre farm, mill and exact factory identity are not fully published. |
|---|---|
| Traceability level | Fabric-country level |
| Cotton: country of origin | Not disclosed |
| Weaving / knitting mill: name + country | Fabric made in China; mill not named |
| Cut-and-sew / assembly factory: NAME | Not named |
| Factory: city + country | China for fabric production; final garment production details require SKU/brand verification |
| Sourcing red flags | The range is natural-fibre-led but not synthetic-free because 4% Lycra is disclosed. |
| Owner | Independent founder-led brand |
|---|---|
| Registered legal entity | NATASHA TONIC LLC Read recorded source |
| Verification status | Published listing with scanner evidence recorded; final score withheld because the production scanner returned client_unverified / publish_eligible=false. |
|---|---|
| Sources checked | https://natashatonic.com/pages/transparancy and current swim product pages Read recorded source |
| Location | United States. |
|---|
| Shipping | See brand checkout for current US shipping terms. |
|---|---|
| Shipping International | International: ships internationally. |
| Shipping Notes | Terms may change. |
| Price | $$$ |
|---|
| Total Styles Scanned | 4 |
|---|---|
| Products found | 4 |
| Products with a fibre list | 4 |
| Last checked | 2026-10-02 |
| Products read for the catalogue | 4 |
| How it was read | Observed current swimwear product evidence was submitted to the live Throne Standard 1.2.0 scanner (fingerprint 812e0ea82923b8df). Observed metric: 96% natural fibre; scanner observedScore: 5/5. A numeric final score is not published unless brand.publish_eligible is true. |
| What this means | No unresolved rows in the submitted observed batch. |
| Why no score is published | Production scanner publication blockers: server_verification_required; catalogue_completeness_unverified; unresolved_or_unvalidated_department. The listing remains public with evidence and limitations instead of an unverified numeric score. |
| In-scope catalogue total | 4 observed current swim rows; complete category denominator not independently established |
| Products read for the score | 4 |
| Worst-case complete result (%) | 96 |
| Best-case complete result (%) | 96 |
| Public qualification note | Observed scanner result only: 96% natural-fibre metric, observed 5/5. This is not the public HTT score until the scanner's publication gate passes. |
| Brand Name | Natasha Tonic |
|---|---|
info@natashatonic.com |
| About | Natasha Tonic is a US natural-fabric swimwear brand using a hemp and certified organic cotton blend with 4% Lycra. The brand says the fabric is made in China, purchased through a US supplier and produced in small quantities with low-impact dye processes. |
|---|---|
| Excerpt | US hemp and organic-cotton swimwear using a 4% Lycra stretch component. |
| Feature 1 | Natasha Tonic openly discloses that its fabric is a blend of hemp, certified organic cotton and 4% Lycra. |
| Feature 2 | The fabric is stated to be made in China and purchased locally in the USA through a supplier using ocean freight. |
| Feature 3 | The brand says it uses low-impact dyes, biodegradable dye auxiliaries and on-site heat reclamation/water filtration processes. |
| POC | Ownership ethnicity is not stated. |
|---|---|
| LGBT | LGBTQ+ ownership status is not stated. |
| Supplier disclosure | Partial |
| Dye house: name + country | Low-impact dye process stated; dye house not named |
Is this brand named on each list? Results refer to the linked list and dated source data, including documented aliases.
Checked 2026-10-03
The brand and its documented aliases are not named in this source snapshot. Parent-company links require separate evidence.
Read list evidenceChecked 2026-10-03
The brand and its documented aliases are not named in this source snapshot. Parent-company links require separate evidence.
Read list evidenceNo dated source record is stored for this list.
No dated source record is stored for this list.
No dated source record is stored for this list.
List membership is separate from the Throne Score. A missing source dataset is not a verified No.
Represent this business? Provide missing evidence or request a correction. Source evidence and independent authority review are required.