| 31 products | % | |
|---|---|---|
| 100% natural | 92.4% | |
| Not stated | 7.6% |
We analysed 31 JVN Hair products, categorising every listed ingredient by function, origin (raw natural, naturally derived or synthetic) and safety concern. This is not the whole catalogue, so it is reported as a partial read. Percentages show the share of each formula that is natural or naturally derived.
Coverage: Ingredient lists were read for 31 products. The size of the full catalogue could not be established, so no average is shown.
Analyst note: Automated full-catalogue scan via the product feed; every listed ingredient categorised by function, origin and concern. 31 products, 0 ingredients uncategorised.
Tap a product to open its ingredient list, a flagged count to jump straight to the flagged ones, or a column heading to sort.
The full ingredient by ingredient breakdown of all 31 JVN Hair products (1398 ingredients, each categorised by function, origin and safety concern) is free with an account.
Create a free accountAlready have one? Log in
Claims made for this brand that could not be confirmed in a certifier's own register. A brand website is a claim, not a source.
Current parent_company ('Amyris (bankrupt 2023; assets sold)') is outdated/incomplete, JVN Hair was sold to Windsong Global on 13 Dec 2023 for $1.25M with Van Ness taking equity (Business of Fashion, Cosmetics Business, WWD).
Why there is no score: Site could not be read. No verdict is given. Neither a full ingredient read nor a check of the certifications against the certifiers own registers has been completed for this brand, so there is no basis for judging it either way. No score is published. No readable product listing could be found at https://jvnhair.com, so the catalogue could not be enumerated. A manual product by product read has not yet been completed.
Last checked 22 July 2026.
Not yet independently verified. The certifications listed for this brand are as the brand states them. They have not yet been checked against the certifiers own registers, so they should be read as a claim rather than a confirmed fact.
