Rewa Eco-Lodge
An Indigenous village owns and runs this solar-powered river lodge, and its arapaima fishing programme helped bring the giant fish back to more than 4,000.
Image unavailable · no suitable source verified
Visit official websiteGoogle reviews
Google rating · 4.8/5 · 19 reviews
Stored Google rating; this is separate from the Accommodation Eco Score or Throne Score. The current Google rating may have changed.
Read reviews on Google MapsEnvironmental evidence and weighted assessment
Environmental performance and evidence coverage are measured separately. Ownership and community information remain separate from this environmental rating.
| Pillar | Weight | Performance level | Contribution | Evidence and source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nature, biodiversity and regeneration | 30% | 4/4 | 30 / 30 points | The lodge's arapaima page (live in October 2026, linking a 2027 fly fishing price list) says its community protection, research and tagging work has helped restore the arapaima population to more than 4,000. The figure is the lodge's own and undated, but it is a quantified conservation outcome. Source · 2026-10-29 · Corroborating source |
| Energy and climate | 15% | 4/4 | 15 / 15 points | The accommodations page (October 2026) says the lodge is fully powered by solar energy. The FAQ adds that solar power is limited and may not run 24 hours a day, which confirms solar is the only source. Source · 2026-10-29 · Corroborating source |
| Water | 10% | Missing or stale evidence | Unknown | |
| Waste and plastic | 10% | 2/4 | 5 / 10 points | The FAQ says the lodge has a refill station in the dining area, provides reusable bottles, and asks guests to refill rather than use plastic. Bottled water is still offered. Source · 2026-10-29 |
| Food, farming and sourcing | 10% | 2/4 | 5 / 10 points | The accommodations page says meals use river fish, village-raised chicken and local beef. That is one local sourcing practice, with no garden, farm or named suppliers, so level 2. Source · 2026-10-29 |
| Buildings, heritage reuse and land use | 15% | 2/4 | 7.5 / 15 points | Guests stay in traditional benabs, the region's vernacular building style, built by the village, alongside six small cabins in a jungle clearing. Source · 2026-10-29 |
| Transport and operational footprint | 5% | 2/4 | 2.5 / 5 points | All guides and support staff come from the local area, so the lodge is staffed by the village itself. Source · 2026-10-29 |
| Measurement, transparency and certification | 5% | Missing or stale evidence | Unknown |
Standard 2.2 (draft) weights conservation and habitat at 30%, heritage reuse and land use at 15%, energy at 15%, water at 10%, waste at 10%, food at 10%, transport at 5% and transparency at 5%. A pillar contributes its weight multiplied by its performance level divided by four. Solar equipment alone cannot establish a high overall score. Missing pillars are excluded from the performance denominator and reduce evidence coverage. Performance levels: 0 documented absence or contrary evidence; 1 claim; 2 a specific implemented system; 3 several evidenced systems; 4 quantified outcomes or independently verified exceptional implementation. Ratings require at least 70% coverage; below 85% coverage they are capped at 3/5. If less than half the weighted evidence supports implemented systems, the rating is capped at 2/5. The rating is 1 plus 4 times the evidenced performance, rounded. A 5/5 also needs at least 90% coverage, 90% performance, level 4 evidence on at least half the weight, and nature conservation at level 3 or above. Accommodation scores are coming once this category passes its release checks. Evidence must be rechecked within two years.
About Rewa Eco-Lodge
More accommodations
All accommodations
The summary and the instant check are free on every record, always. Members also get the results table item by item, the certificates as checked on each register, and information that has not yet been independently verified.
Keep exploring
Provide the corrected finding and its source. Changes and ownership require independent review.
Report a correction