Skip to content
We hold brands to a published standard. This page holds the directories to the same one. For each, it says who owns it, how it makes money, whether brands pay to appear, what it sells, whether it dates its work, and what it has been criticised for. Hold The Throne answers the same questions at the bottom.
Where we agree and where we do not
These assessments use different methods and scopes. A shared numeric range does not make their scores comparable. Read each original method, source and date; HTT does not treat certification, membership or an editorial recommendation as an equivalent Throne Score.
Comparison statistics are unavailable: a dated, matched record-level dataset supporting these averages and agreement rates has not been verified. Read each directory’s original methodology and the HTT method before comparing findings.
Directories and certification bodies may receive fees, subscriptions or affiliate income. Funding alone does not establish whether an assessment is independent or correct. Aggregate funding claims are unavailable until each entry has dated supporting evidence.
Chocolate Scorecard ownership and money
| Owner | Coordinated by Be Slavery Free with more than 30 NGO, academic and civil-society partners. |
| How it makes money | Coalition funding from more than 30 NGO and academic partners. |
| Do brands pay it? | No. |
| What it sells | None identified. It sells nothing and takes no industry money for the scorecard. |
| Data and privacy | Not applicable, no user accounts. |
Chocolate Scorecard methodology
| What it rates | Companies |
| Scale | Traffic light: green / yellow / orange / red |
| Method published? | Yes, the survey and scoring are published. |
| Dates its findings? | Published annually with the edition year. |
| Can a brand appeal? | Companies complete the survey themselves; non-responders are marked as such. |
| Known limits | Relies on company self-reporting through a survey, so a non-responding company is scored on public information only. |
Is Chocolate Scorecard reliable?
| Is it independent of the brands it rates? | None identified. It sells nothing and takes no industry money for the scorecard. |
| Is it up to date? | Published annually with the edition year. |
| What it is good for | Traffic light: green / yellow / orange / red |
| What it will not tell you | Relies on company self-reporting through a survey, so a non-responding company is scored on public information only. |
Chocolate Scorecard versus The Throne Scan
Across 4 brands rated by both, we agree on 0 in 10 and rate 10 in 10 a lot lower. Their average is 3.0 out of 5, ours is 2.8.
Dog Food Advisor ownership and money
| Owner | Independent US publisher. Ownership not verified by us. |
| How it makes money | Affiliate commission on the foods it reviews. |
| Do brands pay it? | States that brands cannot pay for a rating. |
| What it sells | Earns commission on products it rates highly. |
| Data and privacy | Not verified by us. |
Dog Food Advisor methodology
| What it rates | Products |
| Scale | Star rating out of 5 |
| Method published? | Yes, the rating criteria are published. |
| Dates its findings? | Yes, every review carries a modified date. |
| Can a brand appeal? | Reviews are updated when a recipe changes. |
| Known limits | Rates the ingredient list as printed, which rewards labelling practice as much as nutrition. |
Is Dog Food Advisor reliable?
| Is it independent of the brands it rates? | Independence has not been established. Check the dated affiliate disclosure and assessment method. |
| Is it up to date? | Yes, every review carries a modified date. |
| What it is good for | Star rating out of 5 |
| What it will not tell you | Rates the ingredient list as printed, which rewards labelling practice as much as nutrition. |
Dog Food Advisor versus The Throne Scan
Across 35 brands rated by both, we agree on 3 in 10 and rate 3 in 10 a lot lower. Their average is 4.5 out of 5, ours is 3.6.
Good On You ownership and money
| Owner | Independent. Founded in Sydney, Australia. Certified B Corporation. |
| How it makes money | Affiliate commission on brand links, plus consulting and licensing of its ratings to retailers. |
| Do brands pay it? | No. Brands cannot pay to be rated or to change a rating. Brands can pay for a paid partnership placement, which is labelled. |
| What it sells | Earns commission when a reader buys from a brand it rates. |
| Data and privacy | Website and app; standard analytics. |
| What it rates | Brands |
| Scale | 5-point: We Avoid / Not Good Enough / It’s a Start / Good / Great |
| Method published? | Yes, the full framework is published. |
| Dates its findings? | Yes. Every brand carries a last-rated date. |
| Can a brand appeal? | Brands can submit evidence for a re-rating. |
| Known limits | Rates published policy rather than product, so a brand with strong disclosure can rate well without changing what it sells. |
| Is it independent of the brands it rates? | Independence has not been established. Check the dated affiliate disclosure and assessment method. |
| Is it up to date? | Yes. Every brand carries a last-rated date. |
| What it is good for | 5-point: We Avoid / Not Good Enough / It’s a Start / Good / Great |
| What it will not tell you | Rates published policy rather than product, so a brand with strong disclosure can rate well without changing what it sells. |
Good On You versus The Throne Scan
Across 248 brands rated by both, we agree on 3 in 10 and rate 3 in 10 a lot lower. Their average is 3.4 out of 5, ours is 2.7.
Cruelty-Free Kitty ownership and money
| Owner | Independent publisher. Ownership not verified by us. |
| How it makes money | Affiliate commission and its own shop. |
| Do brands pay it? | Not verified by us. |
| What it sells | Earns commission on brands it lists as cruelty-free. |
| Data and privacy | Not verified by us. |
Cruelty-Free Kitty methodology
| What it rates | Brands |
| Scale | Cruelty-free status, vetted / not |
| Method published? | Yes, its vetting questions are published. |
| Dates its findings? | No per-brand date published. |
| Can a brand appeal? | Brands are contacted directly for statements. |
| Known limits | Cruelty-free status is self-declared by brands and verified by correspondence, not audit. |
Is Cruelty-Free Kitty reliable?
| Is it independent of the brands it rates? | Independence has not been established. Check the dated affiliate disclosure and assessment method. |
| Is it up to date? | No per-brand date published. |
| What it is good for | Cruelty-free status, vetted / not |
| What it will not tell you | Cruelty-free status is self-declared by brands and verified by correspondence, not audit. |
Cruelty-Free Kitty versus The Throne Scan
Their verdict is a yes-or-no certification, so there is no number to compare. We hold it beside our own score on 944 brands as evidence, never as our verdict.
INCIDecoder ownership and money
| Owner | Independent publisher. Ownership not verified by us. |
| How it makes money | Not verified by us. |
| Do brands pay it? | Not verified by us. |
| What it sells | Not verified by us. |
| Data and privacy | Not verified by us. |
| What it rates | Products |
| Scale | No score, ingredient explainer |
| Method published? | It explains ingredients rather than scoring them. |
| Dates its findings? | Product pages are dated. |
| Can a brand appeal? | Not verified by us. |
| Known limits | Reproduces the declaration as printed, so an out-of-date pack shot carries forward. |
| Is it independent of the brands it rates? | Not verified by us. |
| Is it up to date? | Product pages are dated. |
| What it is good for | No score, ingredient explainer |
| What it will not tell you | Reproduces the declaration as printed, so an out-of-date pack shot carries forward. |
INCIDecoder versus The Throne Scan
Their verdict is a yes-or-no certification, so there is no number to compare. We hold it beside our own score on 231 brands as evidence, never as our verdict.
LeafScore ownership and money
| Owner | Independent publisher. Ownership not verified by us. |
| How it makes money | Affiliate commission. |
| Do brands pay it? | Not verified by us. |
| What it sells | Earns commission on products it scores. |
| Data and privacy | Not verified by us. |
| What it rates | Products/brands |
| Scale | Leaf score out of 5 |
| Method published? | Scoring is described in prose rather than published as a framework. |
| Dates its findings? | Article dates only. |
| Can a brand appeal? | Not verified by us. |
| Known limits | Scores appear inside articles rather than as data, so they cannot be compared or audited at scale. |
| Is it independent of the brands it rates? | Independence has not been established. Check the dated affiliate disclosure and assessment method. |
| Is it up to date? | Article dates only. |
| What it is good for | Leaf score out of 5 |
| What it will not tell you | Scores appear inside articles rather than as data, so they cannot be compared or audited at scale. |
LeafScore versus The Throne Scan
Their verdict is a yes-or-no certification, so there is no number to compare. We hold it beside our own score on 5 brands as evidence, never as our verdict.
Leaping Bunny ownership and money
| Owner | Run by the Coalition for Consumer Information on Cosmetics, a coalition of eight animal protection groups. |
| How it makes money | Certification fees paid by the companies it certifies, plus donations. |
| Do brands pay it? | Yes. Companies pay to be certified and must recommit annually. |
| What it sells | Its income comes from the companies on its list. |
| Data and privacy | Not verified by us. |
Leaping Bunny methodology
| What it rates | Companies |
| Scale | Certified / not |
| Method published? | Yes, the Corporate Standard of Compassion for Animals is published. |
| Dates its findings? | Recommitment lists are published annually. |
| Can a brand appeal? | Certification is contractual; companies are audited. |
| Known limits | A paid certification means absence from the list does not prove a company tests on animals. |
Is Leaping Bunny reliable?
| Is it independent of the brands it rates? | Independence has not been established; funding alone is insufficient to determine it. |
| Is it up to date? | Recommitment lists are published annually. |
| What it is good for | Certified / not |
| What it will not tell you | A paid certification means absence from the list does not prove a company tests on animals. |
Leaping Bunny versus The Throne Scan
Their verdict is a yes-or-no certification, so there is no number to compare. We hold it beside our own score on 1,587 brands as evidence, never as our verdict.
PETA Beauty Without Bunnies
PETA Beauty Without Bunnies ownership and money
| Owner | People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, a US non-profit. |
| How it makes money | Donations to PETA. The listing itself is free. |
| Do brands pay it? | No fee to appear on the do-not-test list. Companies may license the logo. |
| What it sells | PETA campaigns on the same issues it rates, so the list serves an advocacy goal. |
| Data and privacy | Not verified by us. |
PETA Beauty Without Bunnies methodology
| What it rates | Companies |
| Scale | Approved / working for change / tests |
| Method published? | Partly. Companies self-declare by signing a statement of assurance. |
| Dates its findings? | Record modified dates are exposed in their API. |
| Can a brand appeal? | Companies can submit or update a declaration at any time. |
| Known limits | Status is self-declared rather than audited, and PETA’s own campaigning positions are contested. |
Is PETA Beauty Without Bunnies reliable?
| Is it independent of the brands it rates? | PETA campaigns on the same issues it rates, so the list serves an advocacy goal. |
| Is it up to date? | Record modified dates are exposed in their API. |
| What it is good for | Approved / working for change / tests |
| What it will not tell you | Status is self-declared rather than audited, and PETA’s own campaigning positions are contested. |
PETA Beauty Without Bunnies versus The Throne Scan
Their verdict is a yes-or-no certification, so there is no number to compare. We hold it beside our own score on 427 brands as evidence, never as our verdict.
Slave Free Chocolate ownership and money
| Owner | Independent advocacy organisation. |
| How it makes money | Not verified by us. |
| Do brands pay it? | Not verified by us. |
| What it sells | Not verified by us. |
| Data and privacy | Not verified by us. |
Slave Free Chocolate methodology
| What it rates | Companies |
| Scale | Listed / not listed |
| Method published? | Criteria are described but not scored. |
| Dates its findings? | No per-company date published. |
| Can a brand appeal? | Not verified by us. |
| Known limits | Listing is binary and based on stated sourcing, with no published audit. |
Is Slave Free Chocolate reliable?
| Is it independent of the brands it rates? | Not verified by us. |
| Is it up to date? | No per-company date published. |
| What it is good for | Listed / not listed |
| What it will not tell you | Listing is binary and based on stated sourcing, with no published audit. |
Slave Free Chocolate versus The Throne Scan
Their verdict is a yes-or-no certification, so there is no number to compare. We hold it beside our own score on 99 brands as evidence, never as our verdict.
1% for the Planet ownership and money
| Owner | 1% for the Planet, a US non-profit co-founded by Yvon Chouinard of Patagonia. |
| How it makes money | Certification, licence or membership fees paid by the organisations it certifies. |
| Do brands pay it? | Yes. Certification or membership is paid for. |
| What it sells | Its income comes from the organisations it certifies or admits. |
| Data and privacy | Not verified by us. |
1% for the Planet methodology
| What it rates | Companies |
| Scale | Member / not |
| Method published? | Not verified by us. |
| Dates its findings? | Not verified by us. |
| Can a brand appeal? | Not verified by us. |
| Known limits | Members commit one percent of revenue to environmental causes. It says nothing about what they make. |
Is 1% for the Planet reliable?
| Is it independent of the brands it rates? | Independence has not been established; funding alone is insufficient to determine it. |
| Is it up to date? | Not verified by us. |
| What it is good for | Member / not |
| What it will not tell you | Members commit one percent of revenue to environmental causes. It says nothing about what they make. |
1% for the Planet versus The Throne Scan
Not yet reviewed by us. Listed so the picture is complete.
All About Dog Food ownership and money
| Owner | Independent UK publisher founded by canine nutritionist David Jackson. |
| How it makes money | Affiliate commission on links to the brands it features. |
| Do brands pay it? | Not verified by us. |
| What it sells | Earns commission when a reader buys from a brand it recommends. |
| Data and privacy | Not verified by us. |
All About Dog Food methodology
| What it rates | Products |
| Scale | Rating out of 100 |
| Method published? | Not verified by us. |
| Dates its findings? | Not verified by us. |
| Can a brand appeal? | Not verified by us. |
| Known limits | Rates the printed composition, which rewards labelling practice as well as recipe quality. |
Is All About Dog Food reliable?
| Is it independent of the brands it rates? | Independence has not been established. Check the dated affiliate disclosure and assessment method. |
| Is it up to date? | Not verified by us. |
| What it is good for | Rating out of 100 |
| What it will not tell you | Rates the printed composition, which rewards labelling practice as well as recipe quality. |
All About Dog Food versus The Throne Scan
A dated source capture is unavailable. The original source link remains available for checking; no finding is inferred from the missing capture.
B Lab (B Corp) ownership and money
| Owner | B Lab, a US non-profit that also certifies the companies it lists. |
| How it makes money | Certification fees paid by the companies it certifies, scaled to revenue. |
| Do brands pay it? | Yes. Companies pay an annual fee. |
| What it sells | Its income comes from the companies it certifies. |
| Data and privacy | Standard. |
B Lab (B Corp) methodology
| What it rates | Companies |
| Scale | Certified, B Impact Score out of 200 |
| Method published? | Yes, the B Impact Assessment is public. |
| Dates its findings? | Certification dates and scores are published. |
| Can a brand appeal? | Formal complaints process exists. |
| Known limits | Has faced criticism for certifying large multinationals, and the assessment allows strong scores in one area to offset weak scores in another. |
Is B Lab (B Corp) reliable?
| Is it independent of the brands it rates? | Independence has not been established; funding alone is insufficient to determine it. |
| Is it up to date? | Certification dates and scores are published. |
| What it is good for | Certified, B Impact Score out of 200 |
| What it will not tell you | Has faced criticism for certifying large multinationals, and the assessment allows strong scores in one area to offset weak scores in another. |
B Lab (B Corp) versus The Throne Scan
A dated source capture is unavailable. The original source link remains available for checking; no finding is inferred from the missing capture.
Climate Neutral Certified
Climate Neutral Certified ownership and money
| Owner | Change Climate (formerly Climate Neutral), a US non-profit. |
| How it makes money | Certification, licence or membership fees paid by the organisations it certifies. |
| Do brands pay it? | Yes. Certification or membership is paid for. |
| What it sells | Its income comes from the organisations it certifies or admits. |
| Data and privacy | Not verified by us. |
Climate Neutral Certified methodology
| What it rates | Companies |
| Scale | Certified / not |
| Method published? | Not verified by us. |
| Dates its findings? | Not verified by us. |
| Can a brand appeal? | Not verified by us. |
| Known limits | Based on measured and offset emissions. Offsetting is not the same as reducing. |
Is Climate Neutral Certified reliable?
| Is it independent of the brands it rates? | Independence has not been established; funding alone is insufficient to determine it. |
| Is it up to date? | Not verified by us. |
| What it is good for | Certified / not |
| What it will not tell you | Based on measured and offset emissions. Offsetting is not the same as reducing. |
Climate Neutral Certified versus The Throne Scan
Not yet reviewed by us. Listed so the picture is complete.
| Owner | Ziff Davis. Previously owned by CBS and then Red Ventures. |
| How it makes money | Advertising and affiliate commission. |
| Do brands pay it? | No paid reviews stated; sponsored content is labelled. |
| What it sells | Earns commission on the products it recommends. |
| Data and privacy | Not verified by us. |
| What it rates | Devices |
| Scale | Score out of 10 |
| Method published? | Not verified by us. |
| Dates its findings? | Not verified by us. |
| Can a brand appeal? | Not verified by us. |
| Known limits | Rates performance and value, not durability or materials. |
| Is it independent of the brands it rates? | Independence has not been established. Check the dated affiliate disclosure and assessment method. |
| Is it up to date? | Not verified by us. |
| What it is good for | Score out of 10 |
| What it will not tell you | Rates performance and value, not durability or materials. |
CNET versus The Throne Scan
Not yet reviewed by us. Listed so the picture is complete.
Cocoa Runners ownership and money
| Owner | UK craft chocolate subscription retailer. |
| How it makes money | Affiliate commission on links to the brands it features. |
| Do brands pay it? | Not verified by us. |
| What it sells | Earns commission when a reader buys from a brand it recommends. |
| Data and privacy | Not verified by us. |
Cocoa Runners methodology
| What it rates | Makers |
| Scale | Curated stockist, no numeric score |
| Method published? | Not verified by us. |
| Dates its findings? | Not verified by us. |
| Can a brand appeal? | Not verified by us. |
| Known limits | A curated retailer of craft chocolate; its selection is its inventory. |
Is Cocoa Runners reliable?
| Is it independent of the brands it rates? | Independence has not been established. Check the dated affiliate disclosure and assessment method. |
| Is it up to date? | Not verified by us. |
| What it is good for | Curated stockist, no numeric score |
| What it will not tell you | A curated retailer of craft chocolate; its selection is its inventory. |
Cocoa Runners versus The Throne Scan
Not yet reviewed by us. Listed so the picture is complete.
Coffee Review ownership and money
| Owner | Independent US coffee review publication. |
| How it makes money | Advertising and affiliate commission. |
| Do brands pay it? | No paid reviews stated; sponsored content is labelled. |
| What it sells | Earns commission on the products it recommends. |
| Data and privacy | Not verified by us. |
Coffee Review methodology
| What it rates | Coffees |
| Scale | Score out of 100 |
| Method published? | Not verified by us. |
| Dates its findings? | Not verified by us. |
| Can a brand appeal? | Not verified by us. |
| Known limits | Scores cup quality, not ethics or environmental impact. |
Is Coffee Review reliable?
| Is it independent of the brands it rates? | Independence has not been established. Check the dated affiliate disclosure and assessment method. |
| Is it up to date? | Not verified by us. |
| What it is good for | Score out of 100 |
| What it will not tell you | Scores cup quality, not ethics or environmental impact. |
Coffee Review versus The Throne Scan
Not yet reviewed by us. Listed so the picture is complete.
ConsumerLab ownership and money
| Owner | ConsumerLab.com, a US subscription testing company. |
| How it makes money | Reader subscriptions. |
| Do brands pay it? | No. |
| What it sells | Subscriber-funded rather than brand-funded. |
| Data and privacy | Not verified by us. |
| What it rates | Products |
| Scale | Approved / not approved |
| Method published? | Not verified by us. |
| Dates its findings? | Not verified by us. |
| Can a brand appeal? | Not verified by us. |
| Known limits | Results are behind a subscription. |
| Is it independent of the brands it rates? | Subscriber-funded rather than brand-funded. |
| Is it up to date? | Not verified by us. |
| What it is good for | Approved / not approved |
| What it will not tell you | Results are behind a subscription. |
ConsumerLab versus The Throne Scan
Not yet reviewed by us. Listed so the picture is complete.
Cornucopia Institute ownership and money
| Owner | The Cornucopia Institute, a US non-profit farm policy research group. |
| How it makes money | Donations and grants. |
| Do brands pay it? | No. |
| What it sells | None identified. It sells nothing to the companies it covers. |
| Data and privacy | Not verified by us. |
Cornucopia Institute methodology
| What it rates | Brands |
| Scale | Scorecards, 1-5 cows/points |
| Method published? | Not verified by us. |
| Dates its findings? | Not verified by us. |
| Can a brand appeal? | Not verified by us. |
| Known limits | Scorecards are US-focused and updated periodically rather than continuously. |
Is Cornucopia Institute reliable?
| Is it independent of the brands it rates? | None identified. It sells nothing to the companies it covers. |
| Is it up to date? | Not verified by us. |
| What it is good for | Scorecards, 1-5 cows/points |
| What it will not tell you | Scorecards are US-focused and updated periodically rather than continuously. |
Cornucopia Institute versus The Throne Scan
Not yet reviewed by us. Listed so the picture is complete.
Cradle to Cradle ownership and money
| Owner | Cradle to Cradle Products Innovation Institute, a US non-profit. |
| How it makes money | Certification, licence or membership fees paid by the organisations it certifies. |
| Do brands pay it? | Yes. Certification or membership is paid for. |
| What it sells | Its income comes from the organisations it certifies or admits. |
| Data and privacy | Not verified by us. |
Cradle to Cradle methodology
| What it rates | Products |
| Scale | Basic to Platinum |
| Method published? | Not verified by us. |
| Dates its findings? | Not verified by us. |
| Can a brand appeal? | Not verified by us. |
| Known limits | Assesses a product against five categories; a high overall level can mask a lower score in one of them. |
Is Cradle to Cradle reliable?
| Is it independent of the brands it rates? | Independence has not been established; funding alone is insufficient to determine it. |
| Is it up to date? | Not verified by us. |
| What it is good for | Basic to Platinum |
| What it will not tell you | Assesses a product against five categories; a high overall level can mask a lower score in one of them. |
Cradle to Cradle versus The Throne Scan
Not yet reviewed by us. Listed so the picture is complete.
Credo Beauty ownership and money
| Owner | US clean beauty retailer. It sells the brands it assesses. |
| How it makes money | Retail sales. |
| Do brands pay it? | Brands are stocked commercially. |
| What it sells | It sells every brand it assesses. Its standard determines its own inventory. |
| Data and privacy | Retail site. |
| What it rates | Brands |
| Scale | Retailer standard, pass / fail |
| Method published? | Yes, the Credo Clean Standard is published. |
| Dates its findings? | Not published per brand. |
| Can a brand appeal? | Commercial relationship. |
| Known limits | A retailer standard is a buying policy, not an independent assessment. |
Is Credo Beauty reliable?
| Is it independent of the brands it rates? | It sells every brand it assesses. Its standard determines its own inventory. |
| Is it up to date? | Not published per brand. |
| What it is good for | Retailer standard, pass / fail |
| What it will not tell you | A retailer standard is a buying policy, not an independent assessment. |
Credo Beauty versus The Throne Scan
Not yet reviewed by us. Listed so the picture is complete.
EarthCheck ownership and money
| Owner | EarthCheck, an Australian tourism certification and advisory company. |
| How it makes money | Certification, licence or membership fees paid by the organisations it certifies. |
| Do brands pay it? | Yes. Certification or membership is paid for. |
| What it sells | Its income comes from the organisations it certifies or admits. |
| Data and privacy | Not verified by us. |
| What it rates | Properties |
| Scale | Bronze to Master |
| Method published? | Not verified by us. |
| Dates its findings? | Not verified by us. |
| Can a brand appeal? | Not verified by us. |
| Known limits | A commercial certifier and consultancy; properties pay. |
| Is it independent of the brands it rates? | Independence has not been established; funding alone is insufficient to determine it. |
| Is it up to date? | Not verified by us. |
| What it is good for | Bronze to Master |
| What it will not tell you | A commercial certifier and consultancy; properties pay. |
EarthCheck versus The Throne Scan
Not yet reviewed by us. Listed so the picture is complete.
EcoCult ownership and money
| Owner | Independent US publisher founded by Alden Wicker. |
| How it makes money | Affiliate commission on links to the brands it features. |
| Do brands pay it? | Not verified by us. |
| What it sells | Earns commission when a reader buys from a brand it recommends. |
| Data and privacy | Not verified by us. |
| What it rates | Brands |
| Scale | Editorial |
| Method published? | Not verified by us. |
| Dates its findings? | Not verified by us. |
| Can a brand appeal? | Not verified by us. |
| Known limits | Editorial journalism rather than a scored database. |
| Is it independent of the brands it rates? | Independence has not been established. Check the dated affiliate disclosure and assessment method. |
| Is it up to date? | Not verified by us. |
| What it is good for | Editorial |
| What it will not tell you | Editorial journalism rather than a scored database. |
EcoCult versus The Throne Scan
Not yet reviewed by us. Listed so the picture is complete.
EPEAT ownership and money
| Owner | Global Electronics Council, a US non-profit. |
| How it makes money | Manufacturer registration fees. |
| Do brands pay it? | Yes. Manufacturers pay to register products. |
| What it sells | Income comes from the manufacturers whose products it lists. |
| Data and privacy | Non-profit. |
| What it rates | Devices |
| Scale | Bronze / Silver / Gold |
| Method published? | Yes, criteria are published. |
| Dates its findings? | Registrations are dated. |
| Can a brand appeal? | Conformity assurance process with verification. |
| Known limits | Largely manufacturer self-declared, with sampled verification. |
| Is it independent of the brands it rates? | Independence has not been established; funding alone is insufficient to determine it. |
| Is it up to date? | Registrations are dated. |
| What it is good for | Bronze / Silver / Gold |
| What it will not tell you | Largely manufacturer self-declared, with sampled verification. |
EPEAT versus The Throne Scan
We cannot read this one. Webflow front end, registry loads client-side
Founded 1989 · Covers Candles, Clothing, Cocoa, Coffee, Cross-vertical, Femcare, Food, Household cleaning, Jewellery, Laptops & tech, Nappies, Pet, Phone cases, Phones, Tea
https://www.ethicalconsumer.org/
Ethical Consumer ownership and money
| Owner | Ethical Consumer Research Association, a UK not-for-profit co-operative. |
| How it makes money | Subscriptions. It takes no advertising. |
| Do brands pay it? | No. |
| What it sells | None identified. Subscriber-funded rather than brand-funded. |
| Data and privacy | Subscription publisher. |
Ethical Consumer methodology
| What it rates | Brands |
| Scale | Score out of 100 (Ethiscore) |
| Method published? | Yes, the Ethiscore framework is published. |
| Dates its findings? | Guides carry a research date. |
| Can a brand appeal? | Companies are contacted for comment. |
| Known limits | Scores sit behind a paywall, so the reasoning is not publicly checkable. |
Is Ethical Consumer reliable?
| Is it independent of the brands it rates? | None identified. Subscriber-funded rather than brand-funded. |
| Is it up to date? | Guides carry a research date. |
| What it is good for | Score out of 100 (Ethiscore) |
| What it will not tell you | Scores sit behind a paywall, so the reasoning is not publicly checkable. |
Ethical Consumer versus The Throne Scan
We cannot read this one. scores behind a subscription; sample table shows Brand X / 90
Ethical Made Easy ownership and money
| Owner | Independent Australian publisher. |
| How it makes money | Affiliate commission on links to the brands it features. |
| Do brands pay it? | Not verified by us. |
| What it sells | Earns commission when a reader buys from a brand it recommends. |
| Data and privacy | Not verified by us. |
Ethical Made Easy methodology
| What it rates | Brands |
| Scale | Editorial directory |
| Method published? | Not verified by us. |
| Dates its findings? | Not verified by us. |
| Can a brand appeal? | Not verified by us. |
| Known limits | Editorial directory; criteria are described rather than scored. |
Is Ethical Made Easy reliable?
| Is it independent of the brands it rates? | Independence has not been established. Check the dated affiliate disclosure and assessment method. |
| Is it up to date? | Not verified by us. |
| What it is good for | Editorial directory |
| What it will not tell you | Editorial directory; criteria are described rather than scored. |
Ethical Made Easy versus The Throne Scan
Not yet reviewed by us. Listed so the picture is complete.
EWG Food Scores ownership and money
| Owner | Environmental Working Group. |
| How it makes money | Donations and grants. |
| Do brands pay it? | No. |
| What it sells | None identified. It sells nothing to the companies it covers. |
| Data and privacy | Not verified by us. |
EWG Food Scores methodology
| What it rates | Products |
| Scale | Score 1-10 (1 best) |
| Method published? | Not verified by us. |
| Dates its findings? | Not verified by us. |
| Can a brand appeal? | Not verified by us. |
| Known limits | Uses the same hazard-based approach criticised in Skin Deep. |
Is EWG Food Scores reliable?
| Is it independent of the brands it rates? | None identified. It sells nothing to the companies it covers. |
| Is it up to date? | Not verified by us. |
| What it is good for | Score 1-10 (1 best) |
| What it will not tell you | Uses the same hazard-based approach criticised in Skin Deep. |
EWG Food Scores versus The Throne Scan
We cannot read this one. 403 to automated requests
EWG Guide to Healthy Cleaning
EWG Guide to Healthy Cleaning ownership and money
| Owner | Environmental Working Group. |
| How it makes money | Donations and grants. |
| Do brands pay it? | No. |
| What it sells | None identified. It sells nothing to the companies it covers. |
| Data and privacy | Not verified by us. |
EWG Guide to Healthy Cleaning methodology
| What it rates | Products |
| Scale | Grade A-F |
| Method published? | Not verified by us. |
| Dates its findings? | Not verified by us. |
| Can a brand appeal? | Not verified by us. |
| Known limits | Uses the same hazard-based approach criticised in Skin Deep. |
Is EWG Guide to Healthy Cleaning reliable?
| Is it independent of the brands it rates? | None identified. It sells nothing to the companies it covers. |
| Is it up to date? | Not verified by us. |
| What it is good for | Grade A-F |
| What it will not tell you | Uses the same hazard-based approach criticised in Skin Deep. |
EWG Guide to Healthy Cleaning versus The Throne Scan
We cannot read this one. 403 to automated requests
EWG Skin Deep ownership and money
| Owner | Environmental Working Group, a US non-profit. |
| How it makes money | Donations, grants, and fees from its EWG Verified certification programme. |
| Do brands pay it? | Yes, for EWG Verified. No, to appear in Skin Deep. |
| What it sells | Certifies products in the same categories it scores. |
| Data and privacy | Non-profit; account required for some features. |
EWG Skin Deep methodology
| What it rates | Products |
| Scale | Hazard score 1-10 (1 best) |
| Method published? | Yes. |
| Dates its findings? | Records are dated. |
| Can a brand appeal? | Brands can submit data. |
| Known limits | Its hazard scores have been criticised by toxicologists for treating hazard as risk without accounting for dose or exposure. |
Is EWG Skin Deep reliable?
| Is it independent of the brands it rates? | Independence has not been established; funding alone is insufficient to determine it. |
| Is it up to date? | Records are dated. |
| What it is good for | Hazard score 1-10 (1 best) |
| What it will not tell you | Its hazard scores have been criticised by toxicologists for treating hazard as risk without accounting for dose or exposure. |
EWG Skin Deep versus The Throne Scan
We cannot read this one. 403 to automated requests
Examine.com ownership and money
| Owner | Examine, an independent supplement research publisher funded by subscriptions. |
| How it makes money | Reader subscriptions. |
| Do brands pay it? | No. |
| What it sells | Subscriber-funded rather than brand-funded. |
| Data and privacy | Not verified by us. |
| What it rates | Ingredients |
| Scale | Evidence grade |
| Method published? | Not verified by us. |
| Dates its findings? | Not verified by us. |
| Can a brand appeal? | Not verified by us. |
| Known limits | Reviews the evidence for ingredients, not the quality of any brand’s product. |
| Is it independent of the brands it rates? | Subscriber-funded rather than brand-funded. |
| Is it up to date? | Not verified by us. |
| What it is good for | Evidence grade |
| What it will not tell you | Reviews the evidence for ingredients, not the quality of any brand’s product. |
Examine.com versus The Throne Scan
Not yet reviewed by us. Listed so the picture is complete.
Fair Wear Foundation ownership and money
| Owner | Fair Wear Foundation, a Dutch non-profit governed by trade unions, business associations and NGOs. |
| How it makes money | Certification, licence or membership fees paid by the organisations it certifies. |
| Do brands pay it? | Yes. Certification or membership is paid for. |
| What it sells | Its income comes from the organisations it certifies or admits. |
| Data and privacy | Not verified by us. |
Fair Wear Foundation methodology
| What it rates | Brands |
| Scale | Member performance: Leader / Good / Needs improvement |
| Method published? | Not verified by us. |
| Dates its findings? | Not verified by us. |
| Can a brand appeal? | Not verified by us. |
| Known limits | Audits its member brands’ factories; non-members are simply absent, so absence proves nothing. |
Is Fair Wear Foundation reliable?
| Is it independent of the brands it rates? | Independence has not been established; funding alone is insufficient to determine it. |
| Is it up to date? | Not verified by us. |
| What it is good for | Member performance: Leader / Good / Needs improvement |
| What it will not tell you | Audits its member brands’ factories; non-members are simply absent, so absence proves nothing. |
Fair Wear Foundation versus The Throne Scan
Not yet reviewed by us. Listed so the picture is complete.
Fairmined ownership and money
| Owner | Alliance for Responsible Mining, a Colombian non-profit. |
| How it makes money | Certification, licence or membership fees paid by the organisations it certifies. |
| Do brands pay it? | Yes. Certification or membership is paid for. |
| What it sells | Its income comes from the organisations it certifies or admits. |
| Data and privacy | Not verified by us. |
| What it rates | Companies |
| Scale | Licensee / not |
| Method published? | Not verified by us. |
| Dates its findings? | Not verified by us. |
| Can a brand appeal? | Not verified by us. |
| Known limits | Certifies mining operations, not the finished jewellery. |
| Is it independent of the brands it rates? | Independence has not been established; funding alone is insufficient to determine it. |
| Is it up to date? | Not verified by us. |
| What it is good for | Licensee / not |
| What it will not tell you | Certifies mining operations, not the finished jewellery. |
Fairmined versus The Throne Scan
Not yet reviewed by us. Listed so the picture is complete.
Fairtrade Foundation ownership and money
| Owner | Fairtrade Foundation, a UK charity; part of Fairtrade International. |
| How it makes money | Licence fees paid by companies using the FAIRTRADE Mark, plus grants. |
| Do brands pay it? | Yes. Companies pay to licence the mark. |
| What it sells | Income depends on the volume of certified product sold. |
| Data and privacy | Charity. |
Fairtrade Foundation methodology
| What it rates | Products |
| Scale | Certified / not |
| Method published? | Yes, standards are published. |
| Dates its findings? | Certification is annual. |
| Can a brand appeal? | Formal certification process with audits. |
| Known limits | Mass balance is permitted for cocoa, sugar and juice, so a certified product may not physically contain certified ingredients. |
Is Fairtrade Foundation reliable?
| Is it independent of the brands it rates? | Independence has not been established; funding alone is insufficient to determine it. |
| Is it up to date? | Certification is annual. |
| What it is good for | Certified / not |
| What it will not tell you | Mass balance is permitted for cocoa, sugar and juice, so a certified product may not physically contain certified ingredients. |
Fairtrade Foundation versus The Throne Scan
Not yet reviewed by us. Listed so the picture is complete.
Fairtrade International ownership and money
| Owner | Fairtrade International, a German-registered umbrella body. |
| How it makes money | Certification, licence or membership fees paid by the organisations it certifies. |
| Do brands pay it? | Yes. Certification or membership is paid for. |
| What it sells | Its income comes from the organisations it certifies or admits. |
| Data and privacy | Not verified by us. |
Fairtrade International methodology
| What it rates | Companies |
| Scale | Certified / not |
| Method published? | Not verified by us. |
| Dates its findings? | Not verified by us. |
| Can a brand appeal? | Not verified by us. |
| Known limits | Mass balance is permitted for some commodities, so a certified product may not physically contain certified ingredients. |
Is Fairtrade International reliable?
| Is it independent of the brands it rates? | Independence has not been established; funding alone is insufficient to determine it. |
| Is it up to date? | Not verified by us. |
| What it is good for | Certified / not |
| What it will not tell you | Mass balance is permitted for some commodities, so a certified product may not physically contain certified ingredients. |
Fairtrade International versus The Throne Scan
Not yet reviewed by us. Listed so the picture is complete.
Fashion Revolution ownership and money
| Owner | Fashion Revolution, a UK non-profit founded after the Rana Plaza collapse. |
| How it makes money | Donations and grants. |
| Do brands pay it? | No. |
| What it sells | None identified. It sells nothing to the companies it covers. |
| Data and privacy | Not verified by us. |
Fashion Revolution methodology
| What it rates | Brands |
| Scale | Transparency Index, percentage |
| Method published? | Not verified by us. |
| Dates its findings? | Not verified by us. |
| Can a brand appeal? | Not verified by us. |
| Known limits | Measures disclosure, not conduct. A brand can score highly for publishing detail about practices that are still poor. |
Is Fashion Revolution reliable?
| Is it independent of the brands it rates? | None identified. It sells nothing to the companies it covers. |
| Is it up to date? | Not verified by us. |
| What it is good for | Transparency Index, percentage |
| What it will not tell you | Measures disclosure, not conduct. A brand can score highly for publishing detail about practices that are still poor. |
Fashion Revolution versus The Throne Scan
Not yet reviewed by us. Listed so the picture is complete.
Food Empowerment Project ownership and money
| Owner | Food Empowerment Project, a US vegan food justice non-profit. |
| How it makes money | Donations and grants. |
| Do brands pay it? | No. |
| What it sells | None identified. It sells nothing to the companies it covers. |
| Data and privacy | Not verified by us. |
Food Empowerment Project methodology
| What it rates | Companies |
| Scale | Recommended / not recommended |
| Method published? | Not verified by us. |
| Dates its findings? | Not verified by us. |
| Can a brand appeal? | Not verified by us. |
| Known limits | Recommendations are based on company responses to enquiries; non-responders are treated as unrecommended. |
Is Food Empowerment Project reliable?
| Is it independent of the brands it rates? | None identified. It sells nothing to the companies it covers. |
| Is it up to date? | Not verified by us. |
| What it is good for | Recommended / not recommended |
| What it will not tell you | Recommendations are based on company responses to enquiries; non-responders are treated as unrecommended. |
Food Empowerment Project versus The Throne Scan
We cannot read this one. 403 to automated requests
Global Destination Sustainability Index
Global Destination Sustainability Index ownership and money
| Owner | GDS-Movement, a Netherlands-based organisation. |
| How it makes money | Certification, licence or membership fees paid by the organisations it certifies. |
| Do brands pay it? | Yes. Certification or membership is paid for. |
| What it sells | Its income comes from the organisations it certifies or admits. |
| Data and privacy | Not verified by us. |
Global Destination Sustainability Index methodology
| What it rates | Destinations |
| Scale | Score out of 100 |
| Method published? | Not verified by us. |
| Dates its findings? | Not verified by us. |
| Can a brand appeal? | Not verified by us. |
| Known limits | Ranks destinations, not products or brands. |
Is Global Destination Sustainability Index reliable?
| Is it independent of the brands it rates? | Independence has not been established; funding alone is insufficient to determine it. |
| Is it up to date? | Not verified by us. |
| What it is good for | Score out of 100 |
| What it will not tell you | Ranks destinations, not products or brands. |
Global Destination Sustainability Index versus The Throne Scan
Not yet reviewed by us. Listed so the picture is complete.
| Owner | Global Standard gGmbH, a non-profit owned by four member organisations. |
| How it makes money | Licence and accreditation fees. |
| Do brands pay it? | Yes. |
| What it sells | Income comes from certified operators. |
| Data and privacy | Non-profit. |
| What it rates | Companies |
| Scale | Certified / not |
| Method published? | Yes, the full standard is published. |
| Dates its findings? | Certificates carry validity dates. |
| Can a brand appeal? | Accredited third-party certifiers audit; complaints process exists. |
| Known limits | Certifies the processing chain rather than a finished garment’s full composition. |
| Is it independent of the brands it rates? | Independence has not been established; funding alone is insufficient to determine it. |
| Is it up to date? | Certificates carry validity dates. |
| What it is good for | Certified / not |
| What it will not tell you | Certifies the processing chain rather than a finished garment’s full composition. |
GOTS versus The Throne Scan
We cannot read this one. JS database, lookup by licence number only, not enumerable
Green Globe ownership and money
| Owner | Green Globe, a commercial sustainable tourism certifier. |
| How it makes money | Certification, licence or membership fees paid by the organisations it certifies. |
| Do brands pay it? | Yes. Certification or membership is paid for. |
| What it sells | Its income comes from the organisations it certifies or admits. |
| Data and privacy | Not verified by us. |
| What it rates | Properties |
| Scale | Certified / not |
| Method published? | Not verified by us. |
| Dates its findings? | Not verified by us. |
| Can a brand appeal? | Not verified by us. |
| Known limits | A commercial certifier; properties pay to be certified. |
| Is it independent of the brands it rates? | Independence has not been established; funding alone is insufficient to determine it. |
| Is it up to date? | Not verified by us. |
| What it is good for | Certified / not |
| What it will not tell you | A commercial certifier; properties pay to be certified. |
Green Globe versus The Throne Scan
Not yet reviewed by us. Listed so the picture is complete.
Green Key ownership and money
| Owner | Foundation for Environmental Education, a Danish-headquartered non-profit. |
| How it makes money | Certification, licence or membership fees paid by the organisations it certifies. |
| Do brands pay it? | Yes. Certification or membership is paid for. |
| What it sells | Its income comes from the organisations it certifies or admits. |
| Data and privacy | Not verified by us. |
| What it rates | Properties |
| Scale | Awarded / not |
| Method published? | Not verified by us. |
| Dates its findings? | Not verified by us. |
| Can a brand appeal? | Not verified by us. |
| Known limits | An award to a property against a checklist, renewed annually. |
| Is it independent of the brands it rates? | Independence has not been established; funding alone is insufficient to determine it. |
| Is it up to date? | Not verified by us. |
| What it is good for | Awarded / not |
| What it will not tell you | An award to a property against a checklist, renewed annually. |
Green Key versus The Throne Scan
Not yet reviewed by us. Listed so the picture is complete.
iFixit ownership and money
| Owner | iFixit, a US company that sells repair parts and tools alongside its teardowns. |
| How it makes money | Sells repair parts, tools and kits. |
| Do brands pay it? | No. Manufacturers cannot pay to change a score. |
| What it sells | Sells the parts needed to repair the devices it scores, so a low repairability score does not reduce its market. |
| Data and privacy | Standard e-commerce site. |
| What it rates | Devices |
| Scale | Repairability 0-10 |
| Method published? | Yes, the scoring method is published. |
| Dates its findings? | Teardowns are dated. |
| Can a brand appeal? | Scores have been revised after manufacturer changes. |
| Known limits | Scores a device at launch; later changes to parts pricing or availability are not always reflected. |
| Is it independent of the brands it rates? | Sells the parts needed to repair the devices it scores, so a low repairability score does not reduce its market. |
| Is it up to date? | Teardowns are dated. |
| What it is good for | Repairability 0-10 |
| What it will not tell you | Scores a device at launch; later changes to parts pricing or availability are not always reflected. |
iFixit versus The Throne Scan
Not yet reviewed by us. Listed so the picture is complete.
Labdoor ownership and money
| Owner | Labdoor, a US company that lab-tests supplements and earns affiliate income. |
| How it makes money | Affiliate commission and paid brand certification. |
| Do brands pay it? | Yes, for certification. No, for the ranking. |
| What it sells | Certifies and earns commission on supplements it also ranks. |
| Data and privacy | Standard. |
| What it rates | Products |
| Scale | Score out of 100, lab tested |
| Method published? | Yes, it publishes lab results. |
| Dates its findings? | Test dates published. |
| Can a brand appeal? | Brands can commission tests. |
| Known limits | Runs both an independent ranking and a paid certification in the same categories. |
| Is it independent of the brands it rates? | Independence has not been established; funding alone is insufficient to determine it. |
| Is it up to date? | Test dates published. |
| What it is good for | Score out of 100, lab tested |
| What it will not tell you | Runs both an independent ranking and a paid certification in the same categories. |
Labdoor versus The Throne Scan
We cannot read this one. JS app
Made Safe ownership and money
| Owner | Nontoxic Certified, a US non-profit. |
| How it makes money | Certification, licence or membership fees paid by the organisations it certifies. |
| Do brands pay it? | Yes. Certification or membership is paid for. |
| What it sells | Its income comes from the organisations it certifies or admits. |
| Data and privacy | Not verified by us. |
| What it rates | Products |
| Scale | Certified / not |
| Method published? | Not verified by us. |
| Dates its findings? | Not verified by us. |
| Can a brand appeal? | Not verified by us. |
| Known limits | Screens for hazardous ingredients; certification is paid for and coverage is small. |
| Is it independent of the brands it rates? | Independence has not been established; funding alone is insufficient to determine it. |
| Is it up to date? | Not verified by us. |
| What it is good for | Certified / not |
| What it will not tell you | Screens for hazardous ingredients; certification is paid for and coverage is small. |
Made Safe versus The Throne Scan
Not yet reviewed by us. Listed so the picture is complete.
Made Trade ownership and money
| Owner | US retailer. It sells the brands it lists. |
| How it makes money | Retail sales. |
| Do brands pay it? | Brands are stocked commercially. |
| What it sells | It sells the brands it lists, so its list is also its inventory. |
| Data and privacy | Not verified by us. |
| What it rates | Brands |
| Scale | Retailer values filter |
| Method published? | Not verified by us. |
| Dates its findings? | Not verified by us. |
| Can a brand appeal? | Not verified by us. |
| Known limits | A retailer’s curation is a buying policy, not an independent assessment. |
| Is it independent of the brands it rates? | It sells the brands it lists, so its list is also its inventory. |
| Is it up to date? | Not verified by us. |
| What it is good for | Retailer values filter |
| What it will not tell you | A retailer’s curation is a buying policy, not an independent assessment. |
Made Trade versus The Throne Scan
Not yet reviewed by us. Listed so the picture is complete.
OEKO-TEX ownership and money
| Owner | OEKO-TEX Association, a consortium of European textile research institutes. |
| How it makes money | Testing and certification fees. |
| Do brands pay it? | Yes. |
| What it sells | Income comes from certified companies. |
| Data and privacy | Association. |
| What it rates | Products |
| Scale | Certified / not |
| Method published? | Yes, the criteria catalogue is published. |
| Dates its findings? | Certificates are dated and numbered. |
| Can a brand appeal? | Laboratory testing with defined limits. |
| Known limits | Tests for harmful substances in the finished article; it is not an organic or sustainability standard and is often presented as one. |
| Is it independent of the brands it rates? | Independence has not been established; funding alone is insufficient to determine it. |
| Is it up to date? | Certificates are dated and numbered. |
| What it is good for | Certified / not |
| What it will not tell you | Tests for harmful substances in the finished article; it is not an organic or sustainability standard and is often presented as one. |
OEKO-TEX versus The Throne Scan
Not yet reviewed by us. Listed so the picture is complete.
PCMag ownership and money
| Owner | Ziff Davis, a US-listed digital media company. |
| How it makes money | Advertising and affiliate commission. |
| Do brands pay it? | No paid reviews stated; sponsored content is labelled. |
| What it sells | Earns commission on the products it recommends. |
| Data and privacy | Not verified by us. |
| What it rates | Devices |
| Scale | Score out of 5 |
| Method published? | Not verified by us. |
| Dates its findings? | Not verified by us. |
| Can a brand appeal? | Not verified by us. |
| Known limits | Rates performance and value, not durability or materials. |
| Is it independent of the brands it rates? | Independence has not been established. Check the dated affiliate disclosure and assessment method. |
| Is it up to date? | Not verified by us. |
| What it is good for | Score out of 5 |
| What it will not tell you | Rates performance and value, not durability or materials. |
PCMag versus The Throne Scan
We cannot read this one. 403 to automated requests, any user agent
Project Cece ownership and money
| Owner | Dutch company operating a sustainable fashion marketplace. |
| How it makes money | Retail sales. |
| Do brands pay it? | Brands are stocked commercially. |
| What it sells | It sells the brands it lists, so its list is also its inventory. |
| Data and privacy | Not verified by us. |
| What it rates | Brands |
| Scale | Filter by values, no numeric score |
| Method published? | Not verified by us. |
| Dates its findings? | Not verified by us. |
| Can a brand appeal? | Not verified by us. |
| Known limits | Aggregates other brands’ own claims into filters rather than verifying them. |
Is Project Cece reliable?
| Is it independent of the brands it rates? | It sells the brands it lists, so its list is also its inventory. |
| Is it up to date? | Not verified by us. |
| What it is good for | Filter by values, no numeric score |
| What it will not tell you | Aggregates other brands’ own claims into filters rather than verifying them. |
Project Cece versus The Throne Scan
We cannot read this one. JS brand search
Rainforest Alliance ownership and money
| Owner | Rainforest Alliance, a US non-profit; merged with UTZ in 2018. |
| How it makes money | Certification and licensing fees, plus grants. |
| Do brands pay it? | Yes. |
| What it sells | Income comes from certified companies. |
| Data and privacy | Non-profit. |
Rainforest Alliance methodology
| What it rates | Companies |
| Scale | Certified / not |
| Method published? | Yes. |
| Dates its findings? | Certificates are dated and searchable. |
| Can a brand appeal? | Audited certification with an appeals process. |
| Known limits | Mass balance is permitted for cocoa, so the seal does not guarantee physical content. |
Is Rainforest Alliance reliable?
| Is it independent of the brands it rates? | Independence has not been established; funding alone is insufficient to determine it. |
| Is it up to date? | Certificates are dated and searchable. |
| What it is good for | Certified / not |
| What it will not tell you | Mass balance is permitted for cocoa, so the seal does not guarantee physical content. |
Rainforest Alliance versus The Throne Scan
Not yet reviewed by us. Listed so the picture is complete.
Regenerative Travel ownership and money
| Owner | US company operating a booking platform for the hotels it assesses. |
| How it makes money | Retail sales. |
| Do brands pay it? | Brands are stocked commercially. |
| What it sells | It sells the brands it lists, so its list is also its inventory. |
| Data and privacy | Not verified by us. |
Regenerative Travel methodology
| What it rates | Properties |
| Scale | Impact score |
| Method published? | Not verified by us. |
| Dates its findings? | Not verified by us. |
| Can a brand appeal? | Not verified by us. |
| Known limits | Sells stays at the hotels it assesses. |
Is Regenerative Travel reliable?
| Is it independent of the brands it rates? | It sells the brands it lists, so its list is also its inventory. |
| Is it up to date? | Not verified by us. |
| What it is good for | Impact score |
| What it will not tell you | Sells stays at the hotels it assesses. |
Regenerative Travel versus The Throne Scan
Not yet reviewed by us. Listed so the picture is complete.
Remake ownership and money
| Owner | Remake, a US non-profit fashion advocacy organisation. |
| How it makes money | Donations and grants. |
| Do brands pay it? | No. |
| What it sells | None identified. It sells nothing to the companies it covers. |
| Data and privacy | Not verified by us. |
| What it rates | Brands |
| Scale | Accountability score out of 150 |
| Method published? | Not verified by us. |
| Dates its findings? | Not verified by us. |
| Can a brand appeal? | Not verified by us. |
| Known limits | Scores accountability and disclosure rather than the product itself. |
| Is it independent of the brands it rates? | None identified. It sells nothing to the companies it covers. |
| Is it up to date? | Not verified by us. |
| What it is good for | Accountability score out of 150 |
| What it will not tell you | Scores accountability and disclosure rather than the product itself. |
Remake versus The Throne Scan
Not yet reviewed by us. Listed so the picture is complete.
Responsible Jewellery Council
Responsible Jewellery Council ownership and money
| Owner | Industry membership body, funded by its jewellery and watch members. |
| How it makes money | Certification, licence or membership fees paid by the organisations it certifies. |
| Do brands pay it? | Yes. Certification or membership is paid for. |
| What it sells | Its income comes from the organisations it certifies or admits. |
| Data and privacy | Not verified by us. |
Responsible Jewellery Council methodology
| What it rates | Companies |
| Scale | Certified member / not |
| Method published? | Not verified by us. |
| Dates its findings? | Not verified by us. |
| Can a brand appeal? | Not verified by us. |
| Known limits | An industry membership body funded by the industry it certifies; has been criticised for that structure. |
Is Responsible Jewellery Council reliable?
| Is it independent of the brands it rates? | Independence has not been established; funding alone is insufficient to determine it. |
| Is it up to date? | Not verified by us. |
| What it is good for | Certified member / not |
| What it will not tell you | An industry membership body funded by the industry it certifies; has been criticised for that structure. |
Responsible Jewellery Council versus The Throne Scan
Not yet reviewed by us. Listed so the picture is complete.
RTINGS ownership and money
| Owner | RTINGS.com, an independent Canadian testing company funded by readers and affiliate income. |
| How it makes money | Advertising and affiliate commission. |
| Do brands pay it? | No paid reviews stated; sponsored content is labelled. |
| What it sells | Earns commission on the products it recommends. |
| Data and privacy | Not verified by us. |
| What it rates | Products |
| Scale | Scores out of 10 per test |
| Method published? | Not verified by us. |
| Dates its findings? | Not verified by us. |
| Can a brand appeal? | Not verified by us. |
| Known limits | Tests measured performance in a lab; does not assess materials or supply chain. |
| Is it independent of the brands it rates? | Independence has not been established. Check the dated affiliate disclosure and assessment method. |
| Is it up to date? | Not verified by us. |
| What it is good for | Scores out of 10 per test |
| What it will not tell you | Tests measured performance in a lab; does not assess materials or supply chain. |
RTINGS versus The Throne Scan
Not yet reviewed by us. Listed so the picture is complete.
Smithsonian Bird Friendly
Smithsonian Bird Friendly ownership and money
| Owner | Smithsonian Migratory Bird Center, part of the Smithsonian Institution. |
| How it makes money | Certification, licence or membership fees paid by the organisations it certifies. |
| Do brands pay it? | Yes. Certification or membership is paid for. |
| What it sells | Its income comes from the organisations it certifies or admits. |
| Data and privacy | Not verified by us. |
Smithsonian Bird Friendly methodology
| What it rates | Farms/brands |
| Scale | Certified / not |
| Method published? | Not verified by us. |
| Dates its findings? | Not verified by us. |
| Can a brand appeal? | Not verified by us. |
| Known limits | Certifies farms against shade and organic criteria; a paid certification with small coverage. |
Is Smithsonian Bird Friendly reliable?
| Is it independent of the brands it rates? | Independence has not been established; funding alone is insufficient to determine it. |
| Is it up to date? | Not verified by us. |
| What it is good for | Certified / not |
| What it will not tell you | Certifies farms against shade and organic criteria; a paid certification with small coverage. |
Smithsonian Bird Friendly versus The Throne Scan
Not yet reviewed by us. Listed so the picture is complete.
Soil Association ownership and money
| Owner | Soil Association, a UK charity and organic certifier. |
| How it makes money | Certification, licence or membership fees paid by the organisations it certifies. |
| Do brands pay it? | Yes. Certification or membership is paid for. |
| What it sells | Its income comes from the organisations it certifies or admits. |
| Data and privacy | Not verified by us. |
Soil Association methodology
| What it rates | Companies |
| Scale | Certified organic / not |
| Method published? | Not verified by us. |
| Dates its findings? | Not verified by us. |
| Can a brand appeal? | Not verified by us. |
| Known limits | Certifies organic production. It is not a measure of a finished product’s full composition. |
Is Soil Association reliable?
| Is it independent of the brands it rates? | Independence has not been established; funding alone is insufficient to determine it. |
| Is it up to date? | Not verified by us. |
| What it is good for | Certified organic / not |
| What it will not tell you | Certifies organic production. It is not a measure of a finished product’s full composition. |
Soil Association versus The Throne Scan
Not yet reviewed by us. Listed so the picture is complete.
Sustainable Furnishings Council
Sustainable Furnishings Council ownership and money
| Owner | US industry membership body. |
| How it makes money | Certification, licence or membership fees paid by the organisations it certifies. |
| Do brands pay it? | Yes. Certification or membership is paid for. |
| What it sells | Its income comes from the organisations it certifies or admits. |
| Data and privacy | Not verified by us. |
Sustainable Furnishings Council methodology
| What it rates | Companies |
| Scale | Member / not |
| Method published? | Not verified by us. |
| Dates its findings? | Not verified by us. |
| Can a brand appeal? | Not verified by us. |
| Known limits | An industry membership body. |
Is Sustainable Furnishings Council reliable?
| Is it independent of the brands it rates? | Independence has not been established; funding alone is insufficient to determine it. |
| Is it up to date? | Not verified by us. |
| What it is good for | Member / not |
| What it will not tell you | An industry membership body. |
Sustainable Furnishings Council versus The Throne Scan
Not yet reviewed by us. Listed so the picture is complete.
Sustainable Jungle ownership and money
| Owner | Independent publisher. Ownership not verified by us. |
| How it makes money | Affiliate commission on links to the brands it features. |
| Do brands pay it? | Not verified by us. |
| What it sells | Earns commission when a reader buys from a brand it recommends. |
| Data and privacy | Not verified by us. |
Sustainable Jungle methodology
| What it rates | Brands |
| Scale | Editorial list, no numeric score |
| Method published? | Not verified by us. |
| Dates its findings? | Not verified by us. |
| Can a brand appeal? | Not verified by us. |
| Known limits | Editorial round-ups rather than a rated database. |
Is Sustainable Jungle reliable?
| Is it independent of the brands it rates? | Independence has not been established. Check the dated affiliate disclosure and assessment method. |
| Is it up to date? | Not verified by us. |
| What it is good for | Editorial list, no numeric score |
| What it will not tell you | Editorial round-ups rather than a rated database. |
Sustainable Jungle versus The Throne Scan
A dated source capture is unavailable. The original source link remains available for checking; no finding is inferred from the missing capture.
Sustainable Rosie ownership and money
| Owner | Independent publisher. Ownership not verified by us. |
| How it makes money | Affiliate commission on links to the brands it features. |
| Do brands pay it? | Not verified by us. |
| What it sells | Earns commission when a reader buys from a brand it recommends. |
| Data and privacy | Not verified by us. |
Sustainable Rosie methodology
| What it rates | Brands |
| Scale | Editorial list |
| Method published? | Not verified by us. |
| Dates its findings? | Not verified by us. |
| Can a brand appeal? | Not verified by us. |
| Known limits | Editorial listings. |
Is Sustainable Rosie reliable?
| Is it independent of the brands it rates? | Independence has not been established. Check the dated affiliate disclosure and assessment method. |
| Is it up to date? | Not verified by us. |
| What it is good for | Editorial list |
| What it will not tell you | Editorial listings. |
Sustainable Rosie versus The Throne Scan
Not yet reviewed by us. Listed so the picture is complete.
TCO Certified ownership and money
| Owner | TCO Development, owned by the Swedish white-collar trade union confederation TCO. |
| How it makes money | Certification fees. |
| Do brands pay it? | Yes. |
| What it sells | Income comes from certified manufacturers. |
| Data and privacy | Union-owned. |
TCO Certified methodology
| What it rates | Devices |
| Scale | Certified / not |
| Method published? | Yes. |
| Dates its findings? | Certificates dated. |
| Can a brand appeal? | Independent verification required. |
| Known limits | Covers IT products only. |
Is TCO Certified reliable?
| Is it independent of the brands it rates? | Independence has not been established; funding alone is insufficient to determine it. |
| Is it up to date? | Certificates dated. |
| What it is good for | Certified / not |
| What it will not tell you | Covers IT products only. |
TCO Certified versus The Throne Scan
We cannot read this one. Algolia-backed product finder, client-side
TechRadar ownership and money
| Owner | Future plc, the same group that owns Tom’s Guide. |
| How it makes money | Advertising and affiliate commission. |
| Do brands pay it? | No paid reviews stated; sponsored content is labelled. |
| What it sells | Earns commission on the products it recommends. |
| Data and privacy | Not verified by us. |
| What it rates | Devices |
| Scale | Star rating out of 5 |
| Method published? | Not verified by us. |
| Dates its findings? | Not verified by us. |
| Can a brand appeal? | Not verified by us. |
| Known limits | Rates performance and value, not durability or materials. |
| Is it independent of the brands it rates? | Independence has not been established. Check the dated affiliate disclosure and assessment method. |
| Is it up to date? | Not verified by us. |
| What it is good for | Star rating out of 5 |
| What it will not tell you | Rates performance and value, not durability or materials. |
TechRadar versus The Throne Scan
Not yet reviewed by us. Listed so the picture is complete.
The Detox Market ownership and money
| Owner | Canadian clean beauty retailer. It sells the brands it assesses. |
| How it makes money | Retail sales. |
| Do brands pay it? | Brands are stocked commercially. |
| What it sells | It sells every brand it assesses. |
| Data and privacy | Retail site. |
The Detox Market methodology
| What it rates | Brands |
| Scale | Retailer standard, pass / fail |
| Method published? | Screening criteria are described. |
| Dates its findings? | Not published per brand. |
| Can a brand appeal? | Commercial relationship. |
| Known limits | Same as any retailer standard: it describes what the shop chooses to sell. |
Is The Detox Market reliable?
| Is it independent of the brands it rates? | It sells every brand it assesses. |
| Is it up to date? | Not published per brand. |
| What it is good for | Retailer standard, pass / fail |
| What it will not tell you | Same as any retailer standard: it describes what the shop chooses to sell. |
The Detox Market versus The Throne Scan
Not yet reviewed by us. Listed so the picture is complete.
The Good Shopping Guide ownership and money
| Owner | The Good Shopping Guide, a UK publisher that also sells its ethical accreditation. |
| How it makes money | Sells its Ethical Accreditation to companies, plus publishing income. |
| Do brands pay it? | Yes. Companies pay for Ethical Accreditation and the right to use the mark. |
| What it sells | Sells accreditation to companies that appear in its rankings. |
| Data and privacy | Not verified by us. |
The Good Shopping Guide methodology
| What it rates | Brands |
| Scale | Ethical Company Index, score out of 100 |
| Method published? | The Ethical Company Index is described. |
| Dates its findings? | Rankings are dated by edition. |
| Can a brand appeal? | Companies are contacted. |
| Known limits | Selling accreditation to the companies it ranks is a direct commercial interest. |
Is The Good Shopping Guide reliable?
| Is it independent of the brands it rates? | Independence has not been established; funding alone is insufficient to determine it. |
| Is it up to date? | Rankings are dated by edition. |
| What it is good for | Ethical Company Index, score out of 100 |
| What it will not tell you | Selling accreditation to the companies it ranks is a direct commercial interest. |
The Good Shopping Guide versus The Throne Scan
Not yet reviewed by us. Listed so the picture is complete.
The Good Trade ownership and money
| Owner | Independent US publisher, funded by affiliate income. |
| How it makes money | Affiliate commission on links to the brands it features. |
| Do brands pay it? | Not verified by us. |
| What it sells | Earns commission when a reader buys from a brand it recommends. |
| Data and privacy | Not verified by us. |
The Good Trade methodology
| What it rates | Brands |
| Scale | Editorial list, no numeric score |
| Method published? | Not verified by us. |
| Dates its findings? | Not verified by us. |
| Can a brand appeal? | Not verified by us. |
| Known limits | Editorial round-ups rather than a rated database. |
Is The Good Trade reliable?
| Is it independent of the brands it rates? | Independence has not been established. Check the dated affiliate disclosure and assessment method. |
| Is it up to date? | Not verified by us. |
| What it is good for | Editorial list, no numeric score |
| What it will not tell you | Editorial round-ups rather than a rated database. |
The Good Trade versus The Throne Scan
Not yet reviewed by us. Listed so the picture is complete.
Think Dirty ownership and money
| Owner | Canadian app company. |
| How it makes money | App. Yuka is subscription funded with no advertising; Think Dirty has run brand partnerships. |
| Do brands pay it? | Not verified by us. |
| What it sells | Not verified by us. |
| Data and privacy | Mobile app; scanning history is collected. |
| What it rates | Products |
| Scale | Dirty meter 1-10 |
| Method published? | Not verified by us. |
| Dates its findings? | Not verified by us. |
| Can a brand appeal? | Not verified by us. |
| Known limits | Scores are app-only and the methodology is not published in full. |
| Is it independent of the brands it rates? | Not verified by us. |
| Is it up to date? | Not verified by us. |
| What it is good for | Dirty meter 1-10 |
| What it will not tell you | Scores are app-only and the methodology is not published in full. |
Think Dirty versus The Throne Scan
Not yet reviewed by us. Listed so the picture is complete.
Tom's Guide ownership and money
| Owner | Future plc, a UK-listed media group. |
| How it makes money | Advertising and affiliate commission. |
| Do brands pay it? | No paid reviews stated. Sponsored content is labelled. |
| What it sells | Earns commission on the devices it recommends. |
| Data and privacy | Ad-funded publisher; extensive third-party tracking. |
| What it rates | Devices |
| Scale | Star rating out of 5 |
| Method published? | Testing approach described per category. |
| Dates its findings? | Reviews carry published and modified dates. |
| Can a brand appeal? | Not applicable. |
| Known limits | Rates performance and value, not durability or materials. |
| Is it independent of the brands it rates? | Independence has not been established. Check the dated affiliate disclosure and assessment method. |
| Is it up to date? | Reviews carry published and modified dates. |
| What it is good for | Star rating out of 5 |
| What it will not tell you | Rates performance and value, not durability or materials. |
Tom's Guide versus The Throne Scan
Not yet reviewed by us. Listed so the picture is complete.
Travelife ownership and money
| Owner | Travelife, run by the Association of British Travel Agents and partners. |
| How it makes money | Certification, licence or membership fees paid by the organisations it certifies. |
| Do brands pay it? | Yes. Certification or membership is paid for. |
| What it sells | Its income comes from the organisations it certifies or admits. |
| Data and privacy | Not verified by us. |
| What it rates | Properties |
| Scale | Certified / partner |
| Method published? | Not verified by us. |
| Dates its findings? | Not verified by us. |
| Can a brand appeal? | Not verified by us. |
| Known limits | Industry-linked certification funded by the travel trade. |
| Is it independent of the brands it rates? | Independence has not been established; funding alone is insufficient to determine it. |
| Is it up to date? | Not verified by us. |
| What it is good for | Certified / partner |
| What it will not tell you | Industry-linked certification funded by the travel trade. |
Travelife versus The Throne Scan
Not yet reviewed by us. Listed so the picture is complete.
Which? ownership and money
| Owner | Consumers’ Association, a UK charity. |
| How it makes money | Subscriptions and its endorsement schemes. |
| Do brands pay it? | Businesses pay to use Which? Trusted Trader and Best Buy endorsements. |
| What it sells | Sells endorsement licences to businesses it also rates. |
| Data and privacy | Subscription charity. |
| What it rates | Devices |
| Scale | Score out of 100, Best Buy flag |
| Method published? | Testing is described but detailed results are subscriber-only. |
| Dates its findings? | Tests are dated. |
| Can a brand appeal? | Manufacturers are given results before publication. |
| Known limits | Scores are behind a paywall. |
| Is it independent of the brands it rates? | Sells endorsement licences to businesses it also rates. |
| Is it up to date? | Tests are dated. |
| What it is good for | Score out of 100, Best Buy flag |
| What it will not tell you | Scores are behind a paywall. |
Which? versus The Throne Scan
We cannot read this one. scores behind a subscription
Women's Voices for the Earth
Women's Voices for the Earth ownership and money
| Owner | US environmental health non-profit. |
| How it makes money | Donations and grants. |
| Do brands pay it? | No. |
| What it sells | None identified. It sells nothing to the companies it covers. |
| Data and privacy | Not verified by us. |
Women's Voices for the Earth methodology
| What it rates | Brands |
| Scale | Disclosure assessment |
| Method published? | Not verified by us. |
| Dates its findings? | Not verified by us. |
| Can a brand appeal? | Not verified by us. |
| Known limits | Not verified by us. |
Is Women's Voices for the Earth reliable?
| Is it independent of the brands it rates? | None identified. It sells nothing to the companies it covers. |
| Is it up to date? | Not verified by us. |
| What it is good for | Disclosure assessment |
| What it will not tell you | Not verified by us. |
Women's Voices for the Earth versus The Throne Scan
Not yet reviewed by us. Listed so the picture is complete.
| Owner | Yuca SAS, a French company. Subscription funded, no advertising. |
| How it makes money | App. Yuka is subscription funded with no advertising; Think Dirty has run brand partnerships. |
| Do brands pay it? | Not verified by us. |
| What it sells | Not verified by us. |
| Data and privacy | Mobile app; scanning history is collected. |
| What it rates | Products |
| Scale | Score out of 100 |
| Method published? | Not verified by us. |
| Dates its findings? | Not verified by us. |
| Can a brand appeal? | Not verified by us. |
| Known limits | Scores are generated from the declared ingredient list and a fixed rule set. |
| Is it independent of the brands it rates? | Not verified by us. |
| Is it up to date? | Not verified by us. |
| What it is good for | Score out of 100 |
| What it will not tell you | Scores are generated from the declared ingredient list and a fixed rule set. |
Yuka versus The Throne Scan
Not yet reviewed by us. Listed so the picture is complete.
Founded 2021 · Covers every category on this page · Based British company, run from a farm in Colombia
Hold The Throne ownership and money
| Owner | Independently owned and run by one person, @queenofvitality on Instagram. No investors, no parent company, no industry funding. |
| How it makes money | Mostly reader subscriptions. Some affiliate commission on links to brands. That is the whole of it. |
| Do brands pay us? | No. A brand cannot pay to be listed, to be scored, to change a score, or to be removed. There is no paid placement and no sponsored listing. |
| What we sell | Subscriptions to readers. We do not sell certification, accreditation, badges, consulting or data to the brands we rate. |
| Where the conflict is | Affiliate commission is a real conflict and worth naming: we earn if a reader buys from a brand. It does not touch the score, because the score comes from reading the product’s own composition, but it is income connected to brands we rate and you should know that. |
| Data and privacy | Accounts for subscribers. We do not sell reader data. |
Hold The Throne methodology
| What we rate | The product itself, not the company’s policy. Clothing on fibre composition, beauty on the INCI list, food and chocolate on the ingredient list, pet food on named whole meat against derivatives and fillers, electronics on materials, recycled content and repairability. |
| Scale | One to five, with the working shown per product. |
| Method published? | Yes. Every report shows how many products were read, out of how many, and the source of each composition. |
| Dates our findings? | Yes. Every scored page carries the date it was last checked. |
| Can a brand appeal? | Yes. If a composition has changed we re-scan and the score moves. Evidence changes the score; nothing else does. |
| Known limits | We can only read what a brand publishes. Where a company puts its ingredients in an image or behind JavaScript we cannot score it, and the page says so rather than guessing. Our scores are also stricter than everyone else’s, which will read as harsh if you expect a policy score. |
| Independence | Plant based and consistent about it. We do not recommend animal products. Listings are verified in person where possible, which involves travel and filming, and none of that travel is paid for by a brand. |
Hold The Throne versus the directories
We score roughly three quarters of a point lower than every directory we can compare against. Nothing here says they are wrong. They answer different questions: whether a company has good policies, whether it tests on animals, whether its cocoa is responsibly sourced. Those are real questions and we cite their answers on every brand page. Ours is narrower and harder to pass, and we take no money from anyone to soften it.
(function(){
function norm(s){return String(s||'').replace(/\s+/g,' ').trim()}
function htmlEsc(s){var d=document.createElement('div');d.textContent=String(s??'');return d.innerHTML}
function valid(v){return v!==undefined&&v!==null&&v!==''&&!(Array.isArray(v)&&!v.length)}
function directHost(url){try{return new URL(url,location.origin).hostname.replace(/^www\./,'')}catch(e){return ''}}
function isAffiliate(url){
var h=directHost(url);
return /(^|\.)(tidd\.ly|awin1\.com|awin\.com|shareasale\.com|anrdoezrs\.net|jdoqocy\.com|tkqlhce\.com|pjatr\.com)$/i.test(h);
}
function sourceLink(url){
if(!url||!/^https?:\/\//i.test(url)||isAffiliate(url))return '';
return '';
}
function valueText(v){
if(v===true)return 'Yes';
if(v===false)return 'No';
if(Array.isArray(v))return v.map(valueText).filter(Boolean).join(' · ');
if(v&&typeof v==='object')return '';
var tmp=document.createElement('div');tmp.innerHTML=String(v??'');return norm(tmp.textContent);
}
function labelKey(label){
var n=norm(label).toLowerCase();
var aliases={
'shipping international':'shipping_international',
'shipping notes':'shipping_notes',
'website check':'website_check',
'website verified':'website_verified',
'verification status':'verification_status',
'excluded items':'excluded_products',
'sku count':'sku_count',
'products found':'products_found',
'products with list':'products_with_list',
'products no list':'products_no_list',
'brand site readable':'brand_site_readable',
'sources checked':'sources_checked',
'full catalogue scan':'full_catalogue_scan',
'full catalogue reason':'full_catalogue_reason',
'scan publication status':'scan_publication_status',
'scan method version':'scan_method_version',
'scan denominator':'scan_denominator',
'scan products read':'scan_products_read',
'incomplete count':'incomplete_count',
'incomplete note':'incomplete_note',
'factory certifications':'factory_certifications',
'supplier disclosure':'supplier_disclosure',
'traceability level':'traceability_level'
};
if(aliases[n])return aliases[n];
return n.replace(/®/g,'').replace(/%/g,'pct').replace(/[^a-z0-9]+/g,'_').replace(/^_+|_+$/g,'');
}
function sourceFor(acf,key){
var aliases={
gots:'gots_source',
'oeko-tex_standard_100':'oeko_source',
fairtrade:'fairtrade_source',
planet:'onepercent_source'
};
var candidates=[key+'_source',key+'_src',aliases[key]].filter(Boolean);
for(var i=0;i .hs-section'));
function byTitle(title){return sections.find(function(s){var h=s.querySelector('.hs-h2,.hs-eyebrow,h2,h3');return h&&new RegExp('^'+title+'$','i').test(norm(h.textContent))})}
var filed=byTitle('Filed under'),explore=byTitle('Keep exploring');
if(filed)root.appendChild(filed);
if(explore)root.appendChild(explore);
}
function keepExploring(){
var root=findRoot();if(!root)return;
[].slice.call(root.querySelectorAll('a.hs-btn')).forEach(function(a){
if(/^Compare records$/i.test(norm(a.textContent))){
a.href='/extensions/chrome/';
a.textContent='Chrome extension';
}
});
}
function officialSite(acf,brand){
var candidates=[
brand&&brand.site,
acf&&acf.scan_shop,
acf&&acf.official_website,
acf&&acf.website
].filter(Boolean);
for(var i=0;i<candidates.length;i++){
if(/^https?:\/\//i.test(candidates[i])&&!isAffiliate(candidates[i]))return candidates[i];
}
return '';
}
function replaceAffiliateLinks(site){
if(!site)return;
var root=findRoot();if(!root)return;
root.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a){
if(isAffiliate(a.href)){a.href=site;a.textContent='Visit Website';a.target='_blank';a.rel='noopener'}
});
root.querySelectorAll('td').forEach(function(td){
if(/https?:\/\/(?:www\.)?(?:tidd\.ly|awin1?\.com|shareasale\.com|anrdoezrs\.net|jdoqocy\.com|tkqlhce\.com)/i.test(td.textContent||'')){
td.innerHTML='Visit Website';
}
});
}
function fixFullReport(acf,brand){
var report=document.getElementById('htt-full-record');if(!report)return;
var site=officialSite(acf,brand);
report.querySelectorAll('tr[data-htt-record-row], table tr').forEach(function(row){
var th=row.querySelector('th');var td=row.querySelector('td');if(!th||!td)return;
var label=norm(th.textContent),low=label.toLowerCase();
var placeholder=/Source-backed finding pending|Provide evidence for this field/i.test(td.textContent||'');
if(/^price$/i.test(label)){row.remove();return}
if(/^(website|official website|buy link|shop link)$/i.test(label)){
if(site)td.innerHTML='Visit Website';
else row.remove();
return;
}
if(/^sku count$/i.test(label)){
var c=brand&&brand.canonical||{};
var count=c.sku_count??c.product_count??c.catalogue_total??(brand&&brand.counts&&brand.counts.scanned);
if(valid(count)){td.textContent=String(count);return}
}
if(!placeholder)return;
var key=labelKey(label),v=acf[key];
if(key==='excluded_products'&&!valid(v)&&valid(acf.excluded_note))v=acf.excluded_note;
if(!valid(v)){row.remove();return}
td.innerHTML=''+htmlEsc(valueText(v))+'
'+sourceLink(sourceFor(acf,key));
});
report.querySelectorAll('[data-htt-record-group]').forEach(function(group){
var rows=[].slice.call(group.querySelectorAll('tbody tr')).filter(function(r){return r.isConnected&&!r.hidden});
if(!rows.length){group.remove();return}
var count=group.querySelector('.hs-group-head span');
if(count&&/fields recorded/i.test(count.textContent||''))count.textContent=rows.length+' fields shown';
});
}
function certRow(name,claim,source,scope){
if(!claim)return ''; var yes=/brand\/company membership/i.test(scope||'')&&!/\bnot\b/i.test(claim); var badge=''+(yes?'Yes':'No')+'';
return '| '+htmlEsc(name)+' | '+
' '+badge+htmlEsc(claim)+' '+
(scope?'Scope: '+htmlEsc(scope)+'. A product, material, factory or supplier certificate is not treated as a brand certificate. ':'')+
sourceLink(source)+' |
|---|
';
}
function fixCertifications(acf){
var report=document.getElementById('htt-full-record');if(!report)return;
var group=[].slice.call(report.querySelectorAll('[data-htt-record-group],.hs-group')).find(function(g){
var h=g.querySelector('.hs-group-head h3,h3');return h&&/^Certifications and memberships$/i.test(norm(h.textContent));
});
if(!group)return;
var factory=valueText(acf.factory_certifications||'');
var rows='';
rows+=certRow('GOTS',valueText(acf.gots||''),acf.gots_source||'','Brand/company versus certified cotton, material or supplier');
rows+=certRow('OEKO-TEX Standard 100',valueText(acf['oeko-tex®_standard_100']||''),acf.oeko_source||'','Brand/company versus fabric, component or supplier');
var bcorp=valueText(acf.other_certifications||'');
if(/B Corp/i.test(factory)&&!/B Corp/i.test(bcorp))bcorp=(bcorp?bcorp+' ':'')+'Kent also attributes B Corp certification to a supply-chain partner; this is not a Kent corporate certification.';
rows+=certRow('B Corp',bcorp,acf.bcorp_source||'','Brand/company versus supplier or farm');
if(valid(acf.planet)||valid(acf.onepercent_source)){
rows+=certRow('1% for the Planet',valueText(acf.planet||'Listed in the official 1% for the Planet directory.'),acf.onepercent_source||'','Brand/company membership');
}
if(/Fairtrade|Fair Trade/i.test(factory)){
rows+=certRow('Fair Trade',factory,acf.fairtrade_source||acf.gots_source||'','Factory, farm or supplier claim unless Kent itself is named');
}
if(/\bGRS\b/i.test(factory)){
rows+=certRow('GRS',factory,acf.gots_source||acf.fairtrade_source||'','Factory or supplier certification claim');
}
if(!rows){group.remove();return}
var table=group.querySelector('table');
if(table)table.innerHTML=''+rows+'';
var intro=group.querySelector(':scope > p');
if(intro)intro.textContent='Certification scope is shown exactly as held: brand/company, product/material, factory or supplier. Supplier certification is not brand certification.';
}
function sortVisibleProductRows(){
document.querySelectorAll('table.htt-sku-results tbody').forEach(function(body){
var rows=[].slice.call(body.querySelectorAll('tr'));
rows.sort(function(a,b){
function rank(r){
var t=norm(r.textContent);
var cells=r.children;
var comp=cells[1]?norm(cells[1].textContent):'';
return (/non-composition|Normalized breakdown not available|Excluded from textile composition/i.test(t)||!comp)?1:0;
}
return rank(a)-rank(b);
});
rows.forEach(function(r){body.appendChild(r)});
});
}
function fixFullReportLabels(acf,brand){
var report=document.getElementById('htt-full-record');if(!report)return;
report.querySelectorAll('tr').forEach(function(row){
var th=row.querySelector('th'),td=row.querySelector('td');if(!th||!td)return;
var label=norm(th.textContent);
var fm=label.match(/^Feature\s+(\d+)$/i);
if(fm){th.textContent='Fact '+fm[1];label=th.textContent;}
if(/^(Brand site readable|Verification status|Shop link)$/i.test(label)){row.remove();return;}
if(/^Fibre Breakdown$/i.test(label)){
var c=brand&&brand.canonical||{};
var assessed=Number(c.composition_assessed_count);
var plant=Number(c.composition_plant_share_pct);
var coverage=Number(c.composition_coverage_pct);
var missing=Number(c.composition_missing_count);
if(Number.isFinite(assessed)&&Number.isFinite(plant)){
var text=assessed+' assessed products · '+plant.toFixed(plant%1?1:0)+'% plant fibre';
if(plant===100&&(!Number.isFinite(coverage)||coverage>=99.999)&&(!Number.isFinite(missing)||missing===0)){
text+=' · 0% animal · 0% synthetic · 0% semi-synthetic';
}
td.textContent=text;
}
}
});
report.querySelectorAll('a').forEach(function(a){
if(/^Read recorded source$/i.test(norm(a.textContent)))a.textContent='Source';
});
report.querySelectorAll('[data-htt-record-group],.hs-group').forEach(function(group){
var h=group.querySelector('.hs-group-head h3,h3');
if(h&&/^Claims and evidence$/i.test(norm(h.textContent)))h.textContent='Excluded and unscored';
var rows=[].slice.call(group.querySelectorAll('tbody tr')).filter(function(r){return r.isConnected&&!r.hidden});
if(!rows.length){group.remove();return;}
var count=group.querySelector('.hs-group-head span');
if(count&&/fields (?:shown|recorded)/i.test(count.textContent||''))count.textContent=rows.length+' fields shown';
});
}
function httFinalPolish(acf,brand){
var report=document.getElementById('htt-full-record');
var root=findRoot();
/* Score card: the label is the rules link; remove the duplicate methodology CTA. */
if(root){
root.querySelectorAll('a').forEach(function(a){
if(/^Read the scoring methodology and worked examples$/i.test(norm(a.textContent))){
var p=a.parentElement;a.remove();if(p&&/^P$/i.test(p.tagName)&&!norm(p.textContent))p.remove();
}
});
var scoreBand=root.querySelector('.hs-band.hs-two')||root;
scoreBand.querySelectorAll('*').forEach(function(el){
if(el.querySelector&&el.querySelector('a'))return;
if(/^THRONE SCORE\b/i.test(norm(el.textContent))){
el.innerHTML=el.innerHTML.replace(/THRONE SCORE/i,'THRONE SCORE');
}
});
}
/* Hero: keep only the category eyebrow; location belongs in Place and access. */
if(root){
root.querySelectorAll('.hs-eyebrow').forEach(function(el){
var t=norm(el.textContent);
if(/\blocated\b/i.test(t)&&t.indexOf('·')>-1)el.textContent=t.split('·')[0].trim();
});
}
if(!report)return;
/* Features are editorial facts on the report. */
report.querySelectorAll('.hs-group-head h3,h3').forEach(function(h){
if(/^Features$/i.test(norm(h.textContent)))h.textContent='Facts';
});
/* Compact label column for certification rows. */
var cert=[].slice.call(report.querySelectorAll('[data-htt-record-group],.hs-group')).find(function(g){
var h=g.querySelector('.hs-group-head h3,h3');
return h&&/^Certifications and memberships$/i.test(norm(h.textContent));
});
if(cert)cert.classList.add('htt-cert-compact');
if(!document.getElementById('htt-final-report-polish-style')){
var style=document.createElement('style');
style.id='htt-final-report-polish-style';
style.textContent='#htt-full-record .htt-cert-compact table th[scope="row"]{width:16%!important;max-width:16%!important}#htt-full-record .htt-cert-compact table td{width:84%!important}@media(max-width:700px){#htt-full-record .htt-cert-compact table th[scope="row"]{width:22%!important;max-width:22%!important}#htt-full-record .htt-cert-compact table td{width:78%!important}}';
document.head.appendChild(style);
}
function prettySource(url){
var host='';try{host=new URL(url,location.origin).hostname.replace(/^www\./,'').toLowerCase()}catch(e){}
if(/wearkent\.com$/.test(host))return (brand&&brand.name)||document.title.split('|')[0].trim()||'Website';
if(/goodonyou\.eco$/.test(host))return 'Good On You';
if(/sustainablebusinessmagazine\.net$/.test(host))return 'Sustainable Business Magazine';
if(/circle-economy\.com$/.test(host))return 'Circle Economy';
if(/onepercentfortheplanet\.org$/.test(host))return '1% for the Planet';
if(/causeartist\.com$/.test(host))return 'Causeartist';
if(/linkedin\.com$/.test(host))return 'LinkedIn';
if(/instagram\.com$/.test(host))return 'Instagram';
if(/tiktok\.com$/.test(host))return 'TikTok';
return host?host.replace(/\.[a-z]{2,}$/i,'').split(/[.-]/).map(function(w){return w?w[0].toUpperCase()+w.slice(1):''}).join(' '):'Website';
}
function anchors(urls){
var seen={};
return urls.filter(function(u){if(seen[u])return false;seen[u]=1;return true}).map(function(u){
return ''+htmlEsc(prettySource(u))+' ↗';
}).join(' · ');
}
/* Turn raw source URL fields into named, new-tab links. */
report.querySelectorAll('tr').forEach(function(row){
var th=row.querySelector('th'),td=row.querySelector('td');if(!th||!td)return;
var label=norm(th.textContent),key=labelKey(label);
var raw='';
if(/^Where the sourcing info was verified$/i.test(label))raw=String(acf.sourcing_sources||'');
else if(/^1% for the Planet Source$/i.test(label))raw=String(acf.onepercent_source||'');
else if(/^PFAS source$/i.test(label))raw=String(acf.cs_pfas_src||'');
else if(/^Take-back source$/i.test(label))raw=String(acf.cs_takeback_repair_src||'');
else if(/source$|link$/i.test(label))raw=valueText(acf[key]||td.textContent||'');
var urls=(raw.match(/https?:\/\/[^\s]+/g)||[]).map(function(u){return u.replace(/[),.;]+$/,'')});
if(urls.length){
td.innerHTML=anchors(urls);
return;
}
/* Raw URL-only cells such as Owner Link, Instagram and TikTok. */
var text=norm(td.textContent),found=text.match(/https?:\/\/[^\s]+/g)||[];
if(found.length&&norm(text.replace(/https?:\/\/[^\s]+/g,''))===''){
td.innerHTML=anchors(found.map(function(u){return u.replace(/[),.;]+$/,'')}));
}
});
/* The source-list row already contains the links; remove duplicated Source labels. */
report.querySelectorAll('tr').forEach(function(row){
var th=row.querySelector('th'),td=row.querySelector('td');if(!th||!td)return;
if(/^Where the sourcing info was verified$/i.test(norm(th.textContent))){
[].slice.call(td.querySelectorAll('a')).forEach(function(a){
if(/^Source$/i.test(norm(a.textContent)))a.remove();
});
}
});
/* Replace the old report-search listener with a deterministic filter. */
var input=report.querySelector('input[data-htt-full-search]');
if(input&&!input.dataset.httFixedSearch){
var clean=input.cloneNode(true);
clean.dataset.httFixedSearch='1';
input.parentNode.replaceChild(clean,input);
clean.addEventListener('input',function(){
var q=norm(clean.value).toLowerCase();
report.querySelectorAll('[data-htt-record-group],.hs-group').forEach(function(group){
var titleEl=group.querySelector('.hs-group-head h3,h3');
var title=norm(titleEl&&titleEl.textContent).toLowerCase();
var titleMatch=q!==''&&title.indexOf(q)>-1;
var rows=[].slice.call(group.querySelectorAll('tbody tr'));
var any=titleMatch;
rows.forEach(function(row){
var hit=!q||titleMatch||norm(row.textContent).toLowerCase().indexOf(q)>-1;
row.hidden=!hit;
if(hit)any=true;
});
group.hidden=!!q&&!any;
});
});
}
}
function run(){
var p=getTypeSlug();
if(!p.type||!p.slug)return;
Promise.all([
fetch('/wp-json/wp/v2/'+encodeURIComponent(p.type)+'?slug='+encodeURIComponent(p.slug)+'&per_page=1&_fields=id,acf',{credentials:'same-origin',cache:'no-store'}).then(function(r){return r.ok?r.json():[]}).catch(function(){return []}),
fetch('/wp-json/htt/v1/brands/'+encodeURIComponent(p.slug),{credentials:'same-origin',cache:'no-store'}).then(function(r){return r.ok?r.json():null}).catch(function(){return null})
]).then(function(res){
var record=res[0]&&res[0][0]||{},acf=record.acf||{},brand=res[1]||{};
keepExploring();
replaceAffiliateLinks(officialSite(acf,brand));
fixFullReport(acf,brand);
fixCertifications(acf);
sortVisibleProductRows();
fixFullReportLabels(acf,brand);
httFinalPolish(acf,brand);
moveTail();
});
}
if(document.readyState==='loading')document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',run,{once:true});else run();
setTimeout(run,600);
})();
(function(){
if(!/^\/clothes\//i.test(location.pathname)) return;
function norm(s){ return String(s||'').replace(/\s+/g,' ').trim(); }
function num(s){
var m=String(s||'').match(/-?\d+(?:\.\d+)?/);
return m ? parseFloat(m[0]) : 0;
}
function currentCompareColumn(){
var table=Array.from(document.querySelectorAll('table')).find(function(t){
return /COMPARE BRANDS/i.test((t.previousElementSibling&&t.previousElementSibling.textContent)||'') ||
/YOU(?:'|’)?RE VIEWING/i.test(t.textContent||'');
});
if(!table) return null;
var heads=Array.from(table.querySelectorAll('thead th'));
var idx=heads.findIndex(function(th){ return /YOU(?:'|’)?RE VIEWING/i.test(th.textContent||''); });
if(idx<0) idx=1;
return {table:table,index:idx,head:heads[idx]||null};
}
function compareValue(label){
var cc=currentCompareColumn();
if(!cc) return null;
var rows=Array.from(cc.table.querySelectorAll('tbody tr'));
var row=rows.find(function(tr){
var first=tr.querySelector('th,td');
return first && norm(first.textContent).toLowerCase()===label.toLowerCase();
});
if(!row) return null;
var cells=Array.from(row.children);
return cells[cc.index] ? norm(cells[cc.index].textContent) : null;
}
function removeClothing(){
Array.from(document.querySelectorAll('.hs-main *, main *, article *')).forEach(function(el){
if(el.children.length===0 && norm(el.textContent).toUpperCase()==='CLOTHING') el.remove();
});
}
function fixBuyLink(){
Array.from(document.querySelectorAll('tr')).forEach(function(tr){
var cells=Array.from(tr.children);
if(!cells.length) return;
if(norm(cells[0].textContent).toLowerCase()!=='buy link') return;
var target=cells[1];
if(!target) return;
var a=target.querySelector('a');
if(a){
a.textContent='Visit Website';
a.setAttribute('aria-label','Visit Website');
}else if(target.textContent){
target.textContent='Visit Website';
}
});
}
function moveSave(){
var contacts=document.querySelector('nav.htt-brand-contacts');
var btn=document.querySelector('.hs-cta .simplefavorite-button, button.simplefavorite-button');
if(!contacts||!btn) return;
if(btn.parentElement!==contacts) contacts.appendChild(btn);
btn.classList.add('htt-save-brand');
btn.style.display='inline-flex';
btn.style.visibility='visible';
btn.style.opacity='1';
var sync=function(){ btn.textContent=btn.classList.contains('active')?'Saved':'Save this brand'; };
sync();
if(!btn.dataset.httLiveObserved){
btn.dataset.httLiveObserved='1';
new MutationObserver(sync).observe(btn,{attributes:true,attributeFilter:['class']});
}
}
function addComposition(){
var score=Array.from(document.querySelectorAll('.hs-band.hs-two, .hs-band')).find(function(el){
return /THRONE SCORE/i.test(el.textContent||'') && /\/5/.test(el.textContent||'');
});
if(!score) return;
var existing=document.querySelector('.htt-composition-visual, .htt-composition-visual-live');
if(existing){
if(existing.parentElement!==score) score.appendChild(existing);
existing.classList.add('htt-composition-visual-live');
return;
}
var plant=num(compareValue('Plant fibre'));
var synth=num(compareValue('Synthetic fibre'));
var animal=num(compareValue('Animal fibre'));
var semi=num(compareValue('Semi-synthetic'));
var total=plant+synth+animal+semi;
if(total<=0) return;
var box=document.createElement('section');
box.className='htt-composition-visual-live';
box.innerHTML=
'Catalogue composition
'+
''+
''+
''+
''+
''+
'
'+
''+
''+plant+'% plant fibre'+
''+animal+'% animal fibre'+
''+synth+'% synthetic fibre'+
''+semi+'% semi-synthetic'+
'
';
score.appendChild(box);
}
function addCompareImage(){
var cc=currentCompareColumn();
if(!cc||!cc.head||cc.head.querySelector('.htt-compare-brand-image-live')) return;
var meta=document.querySelector('meta[property="og:image"],meta[name="twitter:image"]');
var src=meta && meta.content ? meta.content : '';
if(!src) return;
var bhead=cc.head.querySelector('.bhead')||cc.head;
var img=document.createElement('img');
img.className='htt-compare-brand-image-live';
img.src=src;
img.alt=(document.querySelector('h1')?norm(document.querySelector('h1').textContent):'Brand');
bhead.insertBefore(img,bhead.firstChild);
}
function relabelStandard(){
var cc=currentCompareColumn();
if(!cc) return;
Array.from(cc.table.querySelectorAll('tbody tr')).forEach(function(tr){
var cell=tr.querySelector('th,td');
if(!cell||norm(cell.textContent).toLowerCase()!=='throne score'||cell.querySelector('.htt-standard-label-live')) return;
var icon=document.querySelector('link[rel~="icon"]');
var span=document.createElement('span');
span.className='htt-standard-label-live';
if(icon&&icon.href){
var img=document.createElement('img');
img.src=icon.href; img.alt='Hold The Throne';
span.appendChild(img);
}
var tx=document.createElement('span');
tx.textContent='Throne Standard';
span.appendChild(tx);
cell.textContent='';
cell.appendChild(span);
});
}
function addAllCompareImages(){
var table=document.querySelector('table.htt-kent-ac');
if(!table) return;
var map={
'PACT':'https://holdthethrone.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Pact.jpg',
'GYMSHARK':'https://holdthethrone.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/gymshark-logo.avif',
'EVERLANE':'https://holdthethrone.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Everlane-Clothing-review-scaled.jpg'
};
Array.from(table.querySelectorAll('thead th')).forEach(function(th){
var label=norm(th.textContent).toUpperCase();
var key=Object.keys(map).find(function(k){ return label.indexOf(k)!==-1; });
if(!key || th.querySelector('.htt-compare-brand-image-live')) return;
var head=th.querySelector('.bhead')||th;
var img=document.createElement('img');
img.className='htt-compare-brand-image-live';
img.src=map[key];
img.alt=key.charAt(0)+key.slice(1).toLowerCase();
head.insertBefore(img,head.firstChild);
});
}
function removePriceColumn(){
var table=document.querySelector('table.htt-sku-results');
if(!table) return;
var heads=Array.from(table.querySelectorAll('thead th'));
var idx=heads.findIndex(function(th){ return norm(th.textContent).toLowerCase()==='recorded price'; });
if(idx<0) return;
Array.from(table.querySelectorAll('tr')).forEach(function(tr){
if(tr.children[idx]) tr.children[idx].remove();
});
Array.from(document.querySelectorAll('p')).forEach(function(p){
if(/^Prices are recorded observations/i.test(norm(p.textContent))) p.remove();
});
}
function apply(){
removeClothing();
fixBuyLink();
moveSave();
addComposition();
removePriceColumn();
addCompareImage();
addAllCompareImages();
relabelStandard();
}
var style=document.createElement('style');
style.id='htt-clothes-live-annotation-style-20261006';
style.textContent=
'.htt-composition-visual-live{margin:24px 0 0;padding:20px 0 0;border:0;border-top:1px solid rgba(255,255,255,.35);background:transparent;color:inherit}'+
'.htt-comp-eyebrow{font:700 12px/1.2 Jost,system-ui,sans-serif;letter-spacing:.16em;text-transform:uppercase;margin:0 0 12px}'+
'.htt-comp-bar{display:flex;width:100%;height:24px;overflow:hidden;border-radius:999px;background:#f3efe8;border:2px solid #ffffff;box-sizing:border-box;box-shadow:inset 0 0 0 1px rgba(43,58,92,.18)}'+
'.htt-comp-bar span{display:block;height:100%}.htt-comp-plant{background:#0f5138;border-right:1px solid rgba(255,255,255,.75)}.htt-comp-animal{background:#8a6547;border-right:1px solid rgba(255,255,255,.75)}.htt-comp-synth{background:#9e3028;border-right:1px solid rgba(255,255,255,.75)}.htt-comp-semi{background:#c89432}.htt-composition-visual-live .htt-comp-eyebrow,.htt-composition-visual-live .htt-comp-legend{color:#fff}.htt-composition-visual__bar,.htt-composition-visual-live .htt-composition-visual__bar{border:2px solid #fff!important;box-shadow:0 0 0 1px rgba(43,58,92,.45),inset 0 0 0 1px rgba(255,255,255,.35)!important;border-radius:0!important;overflow:hidden!important}'+
'.htt-comp-legend{display:flex;flex-wrap:wrap;gap:10px 22px;margin-top:12px;font:500 14px/1.4 Jost,system-ui,sans-serif}'+
'.htt-brand-contacts .htt-save-brand{display:inline-flex!important;visibility:visible!important;opacity:1!important;align-items:center;justify-content:center;min-height:46px;padding:0 20px!important;border:1px solid #2b3a5c!important;background:#2b3a5c!important;color:#fff!important;font:700 14px/1 Jost,system-ui,sans-serif!important;letter-spacing:.04em;text-transform:uppercase;cursor:pointer}'+
'.htt-brand-contacts .htt-save-brand.active{background:#24714f!important;border-color:#24714f!important}'+
'.htt-compare-brand-image-live{display:block;width:76px;height:76px;object-fit:cover;border-radius:50%;margin:0 auto 10px;border:1px solid #d8d5ce}'+
'.htt-standard-label-live{display:flex;align-items:center;gap:9px;font-weight:700}.htt-standard-label-live img{width:28px;height:28px;object-fit:contain;border-radius:50%}.htt-kent-compare-restore{padding:44px 32px 36px!important;box-sizing:border-box}.htt-kent-compare-restore .htt-kent-cscroll{margin-left:0;margin-right:0}.htt-kent-compare-restore .htt-kent-cmpbar{margin-left:0;margin-right:0}.htt-compare-brand-image-live{display:block;width:88px;height:88px;object-fit:cover;margin:0 auto 10px;border:1px solid #d8d5ce;border-radius:0}@media(max-width:700px){.htt-kent-compare-restore{padding:32px 18px 28px!important}}';
(document.head||document.documentElement).appendChild(style);
var queued=false;
function queue(){
if(queued) return;
queued=true;
requestAnimationFrame(function(){ queued=false; apply(); });
}
if(document.readyState==='loading') document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',apply,{once:true}); else apply();
var mo=new MutationObserver(queue);
mo.observe(document.documentElement,{childList:true,subtree:true});
setTimeout(apply,250);
setTimeout(apply,1000);
setTimeout(apply,2500);
})();
.htt-qa{margin:28px 0;border:1px solid #D7D5CF;background:#F7F6F2;color:#2B3A5C}
.htt-qa *{box-sizing:border-box;border-radius:0}
.htt-qa-head{padding:24px 28px;border-bottom:1px solid #D7D5CF}
.htt-qa-kicker{font:700 11px/1.2 Jost,system-ui,sans-serif;letter-spacing:.18em;text-transform:uppercase;color:#5C6883;margin-bottom:8px}
.htt-qa h2{font:400 clamp(24px,3vw,34px)/1.1 Aboreto,serif;margin:0;color:#2B3A5C}
.htt-qa-grid{display:grid;grid-template-columns:repeat(4,minmax(0,1fr));border-top:0}
.htt-qa-item{padding:18px 20px;border-right:1px solid #D7D5CF;border-bottom:1px solid #D7D5CF;min-height:105px}
.htt-qa-item:nth-child(4n){border-right:0}
.htt-qa-label{font:700 10px/1.2 Jost,system-ui,sans-serif;letter-spacing:.13em;text-transform:uppercase;color:#5C6883;margin-bottom:8px}
.htt-qa-value{font:600 17px/1.35 Jost,system-ui,sans-serif}
.htt-qa-value small{display:block;font-size:12px;font-weight:500;line-height:1.45;color:#5C6883;margin-top:6px}
.htt-qa-score{font:400 32px/1 Aboreto,serif}
.htt-qa-sections{display:grid;grid-template-columns:1fr 1fr;border-top:1px solid #D7D5CF}
.htt-qa-section{padding:22px 28px;border-right:1px solid #D7D5CF}
.htt-qa-section:last-child{border-right:0}
.htt-qa-section h3{font:700 11px/1.2 Jost,system-ui,sans-serif;letter-spacing:.16em;text-transform:uppercase;margin:0 0 14px;color:#2B3A5C}
.htt-qa-evidence{padding:11px 0;border-top:1px solid #E4E2DC;font-size:13px;line-height:1.55}
.htt-qa-evidence:first-of-type{border-top:0;padding-top:0}
.htt-qa-scope{display:inline-block;font-size:9px;font-weight:700;letter-spacing:.1em;text-transform:uppercase;border:1px solid #2B3A5C;padding:3px 6px;margin:0 6px 5px 0}
.htt-qa-status{font-weight:700}
.htt-qa-alt{display:flex;gap:14px;align-items:center;text-decoration:none;color:inherit}
.htt-qa-alt img{width:72px;height:72px;object-fit:cover;border:1px solid #D7D5CF}
.htt-qa-alt b{display:block;font-size:15px}
.htt-qa-empty{font-size:13px;color:#5C6883}
.htt-sku-result-tag{display:block;font-size:9px;font-weight:700;letter-spacing:.12em;text-transform:uppercase;color:#5C6883;margin-bottom:6px}
.htt-sku-why{display:block;font-size:11px;line-height:1.45;color:#5C6883;margin-top:8px}
@media(max-width:900px){.htt-qa-grid{grid-template-columns:repeat(2,minmax(0,1fr))}.htt-qa-item:nth-child(4n){border-right:1px solid #D7D5CF}.htt-qa-item:nth-child(2n){border-right:0}}
@media(max-width:640px){.htt-qa-grid,.htt-qa-sections{grid-template-columns:1fr}.htt-qa-item,.htt-qa-item:nth-child(2n),.htt-qa-item:nth-child(4n),.htt-qa-section{border-right:0}.htt-qa-head,.htt-qa-section{padding-left:18px;padding-right:18px}}
(function(){
var allowed=/\bsingle-(clothes|body_bath|cocoa|food|electronics|case|bedding|beauty|femcare|kids|toys|homeware|pet|candles|supplements|household|nappies|jewellery|vehicle)\b/;
if(!allowed.test(document.body.className||'')) return;
function norm(s){return String(s||'').replace(/\s+/g,' ').trim();}
function valByLabel(labels){
labels=labels.map(function(x){return x.toLowerCase()});
var rows=Array.from(document.querySelectorAll('tr'));
for(var i=0;i<rows.length;i++){
var cells=Array.from(rows[i].children);
if(cells.length<2) continue;
var lab=norm(cells[0].textContent).toLowerCase();
if(labels.indexOf(lab)!==-1) return norm(cells[1].textContent);
}
return '';
}
function jsonByLabel(labels){
var s=valByLabel(labels);
if(!s) return [];
try{return JSON.parse(s)}catch(e){return []}
}
function firstText(selectors){
for(var i=0;i<selectors.length;i++){
var el=document.querySelector(selectors[i]);
if(el&&norm(el.textContent)) return norm(el.textContent);
}
return '';
}
function scoreCardText(){
var cards=Array.from(document.querySelectorAll('.hs-band,.hs-two'));
var c=cards.find(function(el){return /THRONE SCORE/i.test(el.textContent||'')&&/\d\s*\/\s*5/.test(el.textContent||'')});
return c?norm(c.textContent):'';
}
function parseScore(){
var t=scoreCardText();
var m=t.match(/(\d(?:\.\d+)?)\s*\/\s*5/);
return m?m[1]+'/5':'Not assessed';
}
function parseVerdict(){
var t=scoreCardText();
var m=t.match(/\d(?:\.\d+)?\s*\/\s*5\s*(.+?)(?:\d{1,3}(?:\.\d+)?%\s*disclosure|This is not|$)/i);
return m?norm(m[1]):'';
}
function e(s){var d=document.createElement('div');d.textContent=String(s==null?'':s);return d.innerHTML;}
function fmtPrice(v,c){
if(!v||v==='0'||v==='0.00') return '';
return (c?c+' ':'')+v;
}
var isPact=false/* 25 Oct 2026: hard-coded pre-2.2 Pact score and Kent alternative disabled */;
var title=firstText(['.hs-main h1','h1'])||document.title.split('|')[0].trim();
var score=parseScore();
var verdict=parseVerdict();
var products=valByLabel(['Products assessed','Products scanned','Total styles scanned','SKU count','Products found'])||'Not available';
var plant=valByLabel(['Plant fibre','Plant fibre percent','Plant percent'])||'';
var synthetic=valByLabel(['Synthetic fibre','Synthetic percent'])||'';
var priceAvg=valByLabel(['Average price']);
var priceMedian=valByLabel(['Median price']);
var priceMin=valByLabel(['Minimum price']);
var priceMax=valByLabel(['Maximum price']);
var currency=valByLabel(['Price currency']);
var parent=valByLabel(['Parent company'])||valByLabel(['Ownership'])||'Unknown';
var made=valByLabel(['Assembled in','Made in','Where manufactured','Factory: city + country'])||'Unknown';
var checked=valByLabel(['Last checked','Price last checked','SKU scan date','Scan date'])||'Not available';
var certs=jsonByLabel(['Scoped Certification Evidence JSON']);
var claims=jsonByLabel(['Claims vs Evidence JSON']);
var manufacturing=jsonByLabel(['HTT Manufacturing Records JSON']);
if(isPact){
score='';
verdict='Moderate verified plant evidence · current saved result is partial-scan qualified';
products='217';
plant='60.5%';
synthetic='35.9%';
parent='Revelry Brands';
made='Primarily India; selected socks/towel lines noted as Turkey';
checked='4 Oct 2026';
certs=[
{certification:'GOTS',scope:'MATERIAL / SUPPLY CHAIN',verification_status:'Brand claim only; registry not confirmed in HTT record',notes:'Pact states it uses GOTS-certified organic cotton. HTT does not treat Pact itself as GOTS-certified.'},
{certification:'Fair Trade Certified',scope:'FACTORY',verification_status:'Brand claim only; factory certificate not stored',notes:'Pact states its cut-and-sew factories are Fair Trade Certified. Current factory names and certificate IDs are not stored.'},
{certification:'B Corp',scope:'BRAND',verification_status:'Historic / lapsed in stored HTT research',notes:'Stored HTT research says Pact no longer appears in the B Corp directory.'}
];
claims=[
{claim:'Pact uses GOTS-certified organic cotton.',scope:'MATERIAL / SUPPLY CHAIN',status:'Partially supported / not independently verified',htt_result:'Supported as a brand-stated material/supply-chain claim; not evidence that Pact the company is GOTS-certified.'},
{claim:'Pact manufactures in Fair Trade Certified factories.',scope:'FACTORY',status:'Brand claim only / registry not checked',htt_result:'Factory-scope claim only. Do not present this as a Pact brand certification.'}
];
manufacturing=[
{country:'India',relationship:'Primary cut-and-sew manufacturing; organic-cotton supply chain',evidence_status:'Country-level and brand-claim evidence only; specific current factory names/certificate IDs are not stored.'},
{country:'Turkey',relationship:'Selected socks and towel lines noted in existing HTT research',evidence_status:'Exact current supplier/factory is not stored.'}
];
}
if(document.querySelector('.htt-qa')) return;
var price='Not available';
var priceNote='No canonical SKU price data stored';
if(priceAvg||priceMedian||priceMin||priceMax){
var bits=[];
if(priceAvg) bits.push('Avg '+fmtPrice(priceAvg,currency));
if(priceMedian) bits.push('Median '+fmtPrice(priceMedian,currency));
if(priceMin||priceMax) bits.push('Range '+fmtPrice(priceMin,currency)+(priceMax?'–'+fmtPrice(priceMax,currency):''));
price=bits.join(' · ');
priceNote='';
}
var certHtml=certs.length?certs.map(function(c){
return ''+e(c.scope||'Scope unknown')+''+e(c.certification||'Certification')+'
'+e(c.verification_status||'Status not recorded')+''+(c.notes?'
'+e(c.notes):'')+'
';
}).join(''):'No scoped certification record is stored yet.
';
var claimHtml=claims.length?claims.map(function(c){
return ''+e(c.scope||'Scope unknown')+''+e(c.claim||'Claim')+'
'+e(c.status||'Status not recorded')+''+(c.htt_result?'
'+e(c.htt_result):'')+'
';
}).join(''):'No structured claims check is stored yet.
';
var manufHtml=manufacturing.length?manufacturing.map(function(m){
var name=m.factory_name||m.manufacturer_name||m.country||'Manufacturing record';
return ''+e(name)+''+(m.relationship?'
'+e(m.relationship):'')+(m.evidence_status?'
'+e(m.evidence_status)+'':'')+'
';
}).join(''):'No structured manufacturing record is stored yet.
';
var alternatives='';
if(isPact){
alternatives='';
}
var html=''+
''+
''+
'
Brand result
'+e(score)+'
'+(verdict?'
'+e(verdict)+'
':'')+'
'+
'
Products checked
'+e(products)+'
'+
'
Plant / synthetic
'+e(plant||'Not available')+(synthetic?'Synthetic '+e(synthetic)+'':'')+'
'+
'
Price
'+e(price)+(priceNote?''+e(priceNote)+'':'')+'
'+
'
Parent company / ownership
'+e(parent)+'
'+
'
'+
'
Last checked
'+e(checked)+'
'+
'
Score scope
Brand resultSKU results are shown separately below.
'+
'
'+
'
Certification scope
'+certHtml+''+
'
Claims checked
'+claimHtml+''+
'
'+
'
Manufacturing
'+manufHtml+''+
alternatives+
'
