Natural cosmetics founded 2002 in Sydney by a Mexican-born naturopath; certified cruelty-free and mostly vegan; several plastic-free products; first eco-refillable compact; plant-based formulas.
| Ingredient transparency | Not readable automatically (script-loaded or published as an image) |
| Ownership | Independent (founder-led) |
| Where made | Not stated on the brand site; third party profiles say Australia and Mexico, which the brand does not confirm. |
| Price | Mid-range |
| Cruelty free | Yes |
| Vegan | Partial |
| Organic | Partial |
| Certifications | Cruelty-Free |
| Sold in mainland China | No mainland China retail disclosed; warehouses are in Australia, the USA, UK and EU, and PETA plus Choose Cruelty Free certification bars sale where animal testing is required. |
| Palm oil | Claims it uses only sustainable palm oil but names no certifier such as RSPO. |
| Packaging | Refillable, plastic-free options |
| Good On You | No Good On You listing found when checked in July 2026. |
| EWG | Six products listed in EWG Skin Deep, with no EWG Verified mark. |
| External ratings | Credo Clean stocked |
| Controversies | No public controversies found. |
| Caveat | Still trading and independent, marking 24 years in 2026, but its sustainable palm oil and ethical mica claims name no certifier, and the carbon neutral certification is a brand statement that could not be confirmed on The Carbon Reduction Institute's own register. |
Why there is no score: Site could not be read. No verdict is given. Neither a full ingredient read nor a check of the certifications against the certifiers own registers has been completed for this brand, so there is no basis for judging it either way. No score is published. No readable product listing could be found at https://ereperez.com, so the catalogue could not be enumerated. A manual product by product read has not yet been completed.
Last checked 22 July 2026.
Not yet independently verified. The certifications listed for this brand are as the brand states them. They have not yet been checked against the certifiers own registers, so they should be read as a claim rather than a confirmed fact.
Ingredients are not present as readable text on the product pages we checked: they appear to be loaded by script or published as an image. They could not be read, categorised or compared automatically, so this brand's formulas are not yet verified here.
We read and categorise every ingredient for brands whose full list is published as readable text. This one could not be read automatically, so its formulas are not yet verified here. A complete ingredient list published in readable text is what makes a clean claim checkable.